A study funded by the Atlanta-based Center for Behavioral Neuroscience (CBN) analyzed the viewing patterns of men and women looking at sexual photographs, and the result was not what one typically might expect.
Researchers hypothesized women would look at faces and men at genitals, but, surprisingly, they found men are more likely than women to first look at a woman's face before other parts of the body, and women focused longer on photographs of men performing sexual acts with women than did the males. These types of results could play a key role in helping researchers to understand human sexual desires and its ultimate effect on public health.
The finding, reported in Hormones and Behavior, confirmed the hypothesis of a previous study (Stephen Hamann and Kim Wallen, et al., 2004) that reported men and women showed different patterns of brain activity when viewing sexual stimuli. The present study examined sex differences in attention by employing eye-tracking technology that pinpoints individual attention to different elements of each picture such as the face or body parts.
"Men looked at the female face much more than women, and both looked at the genitals comparably," said lead author Heather Rupp, Ph.D., a fellow at The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction at Indiana University, who conducted the study in partnership with Kim Wallen, Ph.D., a Dobbs Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Neuroendocrinology at Emory University and the Yerkes National Primate Research Center.
"The eye-tracking data suggested what women paid most attention to was dependent upon their hormonal state. Women using hormonal contraceptives looked more at the genitals, while women who were not using hormonal contraceptives paid more attention to contextual elements of the photographs," Rupp said. Although it is commonly assumed males have more interest in visual sexual stimuli, researchers are working to figure out what characteristics are important to men and women in their evaluations of sexual stimuli.
The answer may lie within a small section of the brain called the amygdala, which is important in the processing of emotional information. In Dr. Hamann and Wallen's previous fMRI study, men showed more activation in the amygdala in response to sexual vs. neutral stimuli than did women. From the fMRI study alone, the cause of the increased activity was unclear, but Rupp and Wallen's study suggests the possibility that higher amygdala activation in men may be related to their increased attention to faces in sexual photographs.
Source: Emory University.
Comments
Anonymous (not verified) | 11/12/08 | 05:02 AM
Could this be the rationale behind the outcome of your investigation?
Anonymous (not verified) | 02/01/09 | 16:53 PM
Anonymous (not verified) | 02/16/09 | 13:00 PM
"So, for example, the composite face from the women who had rated themselves as extremely lucky was paired with the composite from those who had rated themselves as very unlucky. More than 6500 visitors to the site attempted to identify the lucky, humorous, religious and trustworthy faces.
From this it seems that women's faces give away far more than men. An impressive 70 per cent of people were able to correctly identify the lucky face, and 73 per cent correctly identified the religious one. In line with past research, the female composite associated with trustworthiness was also accurately identified, with a statistically significant 54 per cent success rate. Only one of the female composites was not correctly identified - the one from the women who assessed themselves as humorous.
The results for the male composites were very different. Here, our respondents failed to identify any of the composites correctly. The images identified with being humorous, trustworthy and religious all came in around chance, whilst the lucky composite was only correctly identified 22 per cent of the time. This suggests that our perception of lucky-looking male faces is at odds with reality.
Why should these big sex differences have emerged? Perhaps female faces are simply more informative than male ones."
So, perhaps I wasn't so off the mark after all when I say that women don't pay attention to the male face because there's less to see- you guys are just more inscrutable!
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126957.300-how-your-looks-betray...
Anonymous (not verified) | 02/16/09 | 13:25 PM
Hank Campbell | 02/16/09 | 17:27 PM
Bente Lilja Bye | 02/16/09 | 17:38 PM
Anonymous (not verified) | 02/16/09 | 18:26 PM
lol. Hank needs to give up the battle. :)
Anonymous (not verified) | 02/16/09 | 18:25 PM
Anonymous (not verified) | 02/16/09 | 18:18 PM
Gerhard Adam | 02/16/09 | 18:40 PM
Anonymous (not verified) | 02/16/09 | 18:52 PM
Heidi Henderson | 04/29/09 | 12:34 PM












Now, if you'll excuse me, I'll be watching "Masterpiece Theater" and listening to Haydn while I look at this Victoria's Secret catalog.