Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By News Staff | August 22nd 2007 11:00 PM | Track Comments
University of Cincinnati Assistant Professor Michael Fry and student Andrew Lundberg have an interesting approach to the fantasy football draft: all you really need to know is what set of players is not going to be available when your turn comes up.

Fry and Lundberg published their results in the Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports with co-author Jeffrey Ohlmann from the University of Iowa.

Fantasy sports drafts have a sequential order in which owners choose players from the available remaining pool of players. Football presented a good opportunity for this research because, unlike a sport such as basketball, players have one position, while sports like baseball often have players in the minors for too long to tell how a player drafted now will affect a team in the future.



So using their principle of exclusion, what advice do they have?

Given their analysis of the rosters they recommend a different strategy than what is considered traditional. Rather than draft two running backs in the first two rounds they recommend taking a RB first, then taking a top QB or WR next and coming back for your 2nd RB later.

Additionally, if you can't draft one of the top two defenses you might as well wait until the very end of the draft because there is too much uncertainty in the remaining teams to waste a high draft choice. That same strategy applies to kickers.

Scouting is still key, of course. If you overvalue a player any heuristic model and tractable deterministic dynamic program will still give you bad answers.

Me? I am predicting the Steelers to win it all. For the 27th consecutive year.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.