Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Mary Hrovat | March 22nd 2007 11:11 AM | 2 comments | Track Comments

About Mary Hrovat

I have a BS degree in astrophysics with a math minor from Indiana University. I'm also interested in other areas of science. My blog, the Thinking Meat... Full Bio

More from Mary Hrovat

All
People where I live still talk about the New Madrid earthquakes that occurred in southern Missouri in 1811 and 1812. I've heard that church bells rang hundreds of miles away in New England, disturbed by the seismic waves, and supposedly the surface of the earth subsided as a result of the quakes to such a degree that it created a new lake (Reelfoot Lake in Tennessee). The aftershocks go on to this day.

I spent part of my childhood in southern California and grew up with the instructions about standing in a door jamb during a quake and all that, so I was used to the idea of California as earthquake-prone, and I understand the reasons for California quakes. It was something of a surprise to me when I learned in my teens about this massive quake in the middle of the continent, far away from any major active tectonic plate boundary, and I gather that it's been something of a mystery what was behind the seismic activity. It turns out that maybe there's a connection between the west coast and the New Madrid area.



A new paper in Geophysical Review Letters suggests that events on the west coast millions of years ago might have led to the New Madrid quakes.
The Farallon plate was a tectonic plate that made up some of the ocean floor between the Pacific plate and the continental plates of North America.

Around 70 million years ago, during the Cretaceous period, it met the continental plate and was forced underneath it, or subducted. The Farallon plate went under at a shallow angle, and hence the subduction process was long and complicated. The plate scraped along the underside of the continent for awhile, and the resulting volcanoes formed the Sierra Nevada in California. Due to motions in the mantle, underneath the crust, the continental plate moved westward over the subducted plate; the progress of the Farallon plate under the continent was instrumental in forming the Rocky Mountains. And all these millions of years later, the plate is evidently still descending, and as it moves it affects the flow of molten rock in the mantle beneath parts of the eastern US.

The new paper describes how the resulting stresses in the crust could have triggered the New Madrid earthquake, and perhaps could contribute to further seismic activity in the area in the future. This is useful information for predicting what will happen in the area in the future, but it also illustrates a very interesting connection between something so long ago and far away, and something much closer to home.

Comments

Great post, Mary, and for me this is a very interesting subject. Seismic imaging has essentially picked-up traces of the Farallon Plate still actively descending into the mantle beneath the continental portion of the North American Plate. The rippling effect of NorAmer sliding across the descending Farallon is thought to have produced the Laramide Orogeny and the Black Hills of the Dakotas, as well as the basin and range country farther west - among other features. Friction from the collision has undoubtedly altered the North American landscape into the mid-continent, and possibly as far east as the New Madrid Seismic Zone, suggesting some role for the Farallon in the events of 1811-12; however, my take is that the subducting Farallon is probably not THE major player. About the same time as NorAmer contacted the Farallon, NorAmer also rammed into Eurasia. If you'll dig out a map of the world's tectonic plates you'll find that eastern Siberia, including the Kamchatka Peninsula, is really part of the North American Plate. When two continents collide, the inevitable result is orogeny and uplifting, and this is quite prominent throughout eastern Siberia and northwestern North America. Collision with Eurasia, in fact, elevated western North America just after the Farallon began to subduct along the west coast. As NorAmer elevated, the underlying asthenosphere billowed-upwards. Coeval lithospheric and asthenospheric uplifting thus facilitated the "shallow subduction" of the Farallon. By roughly 50 M.A., North America and Eurasia were locked in collision along their Siberian interface. This was a collision kept in motion and augmented by spreading along the North Atlantic M.O.R.. To the south of the Alaskan Peninsula, however, there was no collision-zone, only open sea. Continued spreading along the North Atlantic M.O.R. thus eventually pushed the portion of North America south of the Alaska Peninsula to the west. In time, this sub-Alaskan portion of our continent was rotated clockwise and resulting flexure created extension stresses along the mid-continent. Extension then created the Mississippi Valley and "reactivated" an old rift zone near what is now New Madrid Missouri. This was completed by perhaps 40 M.A.+_ 15 M.A.. The great quakes of 1811-12 are thus most appropriately viewed as the byproducts of these rather large and grandiose plate tectonic events, but the most important of those events was probably the collision along the North American-Eurasian interface, which facilitated rotation and extension of the continent and ultimately the reactivation of the New Madrid Seismic Zone.
I am currently conducting research on the disappearance of the Farallon plate and would like to add a few points. What most people seem to missing in North American plate tectonics is the Big Picture. The Farallon plate began subducting much earlier than the 70 my mentioned above. The Sierra Nevada batholith represents an island arc that was formed as the Farallon was subducting beneath the west coast. The formation of the batholith was mostly complete by around 80 mya. However, what most people do not realize when looking at the Farallon plate is that around 90 mya, a portion of the Farallon overroad the gap between North and south America. Cuba is thought to be a part of the same island arc as the Sierra Nevada in California as well as the Sierra Occidental in Mexico. As Cuba continued east, the rest of North America would continue west. The collisions that you speak of in Asia and the rotations on the west coast were caused by the rotation of the entire North American continent. The reactivation of the fault beneath the New Madrid zone occurred as Cuba collided with the Florida escarpment, pushing the east coast north.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.