Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Rod Rose | November 19th 2009 12:44 PM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
About Rod

I've been a newspaper writer for 40 years. Changes in news communication technology fascinate and frighten me. I discovered scientificblogging by...

View Rod's Profile
Call it contrarian stubborness, but I believe there remains that print journalism a critical aspect of American society.

That said, what's journalism?

Matt Bowden, in the October issue of The Atlantic, proposes that we are in a "post-journalistic age," created by the broadcast drive for ratings and the corporate drive for a bat bottom line, both of which are, of course, money.

"In this post-journalistic world, the model for all national debate becomes the trial, where adversaries face off, representing opposing points of view," Bowden said.

One of the basic lessons rookie reporters are taught is to follow the money. Who benefits, who pays, who receives. In Bowden's PJ world, journalists are lawyers, not recorders of facts.
And there's the problem; as lawyers, as presenters of opinion, not fact, journalists are less than useless.

Newspapers -- I can't speak for broadcast news, never having gotten closer to that profession than as a panelist on the occasional Sunday interview show for a low band, low budget Indianapolis TV station -- either ignored or under-estimated the catastrophic impact of the Internet and have never recovered.

The recovery may not happen until, and unless, print news outlets re-invent themselves by accepting there are three forms of news communication: Reporting; journalism and opinion.
Reporting is stenography -- "here's what happened, here's what was said."

Journalism is interpretation -- "here's what happened, here's what was said, here's what it probably means."

Opinion is verdict -- "here's what I think happened, here's what I think was meant by what was said, here's what I believe it to me."

Print news must learn to teach its customers the differences between these phases.
And what, some of you are wondering, does any of this have to do with science?
Reporting is science: the careful observation and recording of the event. Journalism is hypothesis. Opinion is entertainment.

Accepting those definitions are critical not just to print, but to the successful communication of what science means and does to the general public.

And that leads to another blog ...

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.