Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Ryan Anderson | October 15th 2009 06:07 AM | 27 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

You know, I'm tired of hearing about how the Mars Exploration Rovers are so cute, and spunky, but their successor Mars Science Lab is big and ugly. MSL isn't supposed to be cute, it's supposed to be awesome.

Just how awesome, you ask? I'll tell you how awesome.

For starters it's huge: 7 feet tall and almost 2000 pounds. The instrument package on the end of its 8-foot arm is about the same size as the 1997 Mars Pathfinder rover. In fact it's so big that the famous airbag landing system used by Pathfinder and both MERs just won't work. There just aren't airbags strong enough to cushion the impact of such a big rover. And besides, MSL has class. It's not going to arrive on Mars huddled and asleep, cocooned in wussy airbags. No, MSL is going to arrive in style: on a jetpack.

MSL descends to the martian surface on its "skycrane" landing system.

That's right. After its heatshield (the largest ever flown to another planet) withstands a fiery entry and is discarded, and its parachute (50 feet across and deployed at twice the speed of sound) slows MSL down, our action hero will cut the shrouds and fire up a jetpack. The rockets will fire, bringing MSL within a few meters of the surface. And then, as if all that was not impressive enough, MSL will rappel down from the hovering platform, touch the surface, and cut the cords with explosive bolts. It will then smooth the creases in its tuxedo, adjust its tie and order a martini.

Ok, I made up the part about the tuxedo and the martini. But really, its an entrance that would make James Bond jealous. And not only is it a really cool way to land, it is extremely precise, so MSL will be able to access some of the most interesting places on the planet. And just like Bond, MSL has some sweet gadgets.



First, there are the cameras. Unlike the MER cameras, these will be true-color, high-definition cameras. In addition to the two mast cameras (one of which is zoomed in enough to make out details just three inches across at 1km away), MSL will have a hand-lens camera, used for studying details of the surface much smaller than a human hair. The hand lens will also be able to focus out to infinity, and could be used to take snapshots of otherwise inaccessible places, like the underside of the rover. (This would have come in handy for Spirit!) There will also be a video camera pointing down to capture MSL's heroic skycrane landing. That camera may also work during the mission, recording the changing surface features as MSL roves across the surface.

Impressive though the cameras are, the real heart of MSL are its analytical instruments. First of these is the huge organic chemistry lab, SAM, which contains a mass spectrometer to break apart and weigh molecules of martian material, a gas chromatograph to separate the molecules based on their chemical properties, and a tunable laser spectrometer to sense the faintest traces of molecules like methane in the martian atmosphere. Mars has puzzled scientists for a long time because previous missions have been unable to detect any organic molecules, even those that would be expected from comet and asteroid impacts. With SAM, MSL will be able to solve that mystery.

That's nice, but a real action hero needs more. Say, perhaps, x-ray vision? MSL will carry the CheMin instrument, which peers into the detailed structure of crystals by shining x-rays through them. This is extremely important because it will allow MSL to uniquely identify minerals on Mars. All previous missions have been able to measure the elements in rocks and soils, but lacked the x-ray view provided by CheMin which reveals how those elements are put together.

MSL does even better than x-ray vision though. It can also see neutrons. In particular, scattered neutrons. The DAN instrument sends pulses of neutrons into the soil, where they scatter off of atoms up to several feet down. Lighter atoms scatter neutrons better, which means that hydrogen (and therefore water) are the brightest things MSL will see with its "neutron vision". As you might imagine, for a mission in search of evidence of a habitable Mars, being able to estimate the amount of water in the soil will be very valuable.

And of course, just because it has x-ray and neutron "vision" doesn't mean MSL doesn't want the elemental info too. That's why it carries two instruments for measuring the atoms in a target. The first is a classic. Just like Bond's signature Walther PPK, every Mars rover comes armed with an Alpha-Particle X-Ray Spectrometer. This instrument bombards the target with alpha particles, causing the individual atoms to give off x-rays revealing their identities. MSL carries a new and improved APXS, capable of estimating the major elements in about 15 minutes.

Still, for an action hero 15 minutes is a long time. I've never seen James Bond sitting around for 15 minutes waiting for an accurate elemental abundance estimate, have you? No, a true action hero would carry a tool that delivered the info instantly, and preferably involved a laser.


That's why MSL has a laser. No, I'm not making this up. The ChemCam instrument is a high-powered infrared pulse laser, capable of vaporizing bits of rock up to 7 meters away. MSL will use a telescope and spectrometer to collect the light given off by the laser plasma to determine what the target is made of. Even better, ChemCam is sensitive even to light elements like hydrogen and carbon that APXS can't see. But wait, there's more! Since it involves a big telescope, ChemCam will also be able to take microscopic images of the targets hit by the laser.

Oh, and did I mention that MSL is nuclear powered? No sissy solar panels for this rover! Instead, MSL harnesses the heat given off by a lump of plutonium to get reliable, long-lasting power. MSL laughs in the face of dust storms!

Now, don't get me wrong, I have nothing against the MERs. And they are darn cute. But MSL is a jetpack-flying, laser-toting, plutonium-driven league of its own. It is an action hero, armed to the teeth with gadgets to help it uncover Mars' secrets and send them back to Earth.

Now, I'd love to keep blogging about MSL, but I need to get on the phone with Hollywood and pitch a movie idea. The trailer could go something like this:

In a world where rain hasn't fallen in billions of years...
(pan across windswept martian dunes)

At a time when questions outnumber answers...
(cut to orbital view of dry riverbeds)

One robot will change our view of the Red Planet.
(closeup of the Mars Science Laboratory rover)

M.S.L.: Mars Action Hero
(cue awesome rock 'n roll soundtrack and action montage)

[PS - If you liked this article, please vote for it at the top of the page by clicking the gray box to the right of the title and Cornell seal! The number of votes is hidden, but if it switches to say that you voted, then your vote counted. Thanks!]



Comments

Kimberly Crandell's picture
I should have dressed up as MSL for Halloween.  I could have even got one of those little laser pointer things - although I doubt it would be able to vaporize any rocks.  And, ummm... I suppose that's a good thing with all the kids about and all.

Awesome post! I highly approve.

Ryan Anderson's picture
Thanks! Were you able to vote with the little gray box to the right of the title?

When I first pressed the button the number changed but when I came back to the page the number hadn't actually changed

Ryan Anderson's picture
Weird. I know for some people it's not doing anything... Maybe it's secretly counting the votes but not displaying them? I dunno. Keep trying I guess!

Scientific Community's picture
Hi Ryan - we know there is an issue with the voting and we're working on it now.  I'd love to tell you it's some elaborate scientific algorithm - but it's actually just not working properly.  If it makes you feel better, it's not just you being affected.  We'll get a notification out as soon as it's all fixed.

Thanks for your patience, and congratulations on making it to the finalist round!

Ryan Anderson's picture
Ok, thanks!

Hank's picture
I'll send out an email when we figure it out.   It isn't anything consistent but we've had about 40 people affected that we know of (out of about 35,000 yesterday) and we are trying to figure out why.   It will get resolved and we'll probably have to extend the voting by a day to account for it.

It's possible you would have heard from more people if you made it more clear how to contact you...there aren't any links from the main contest page that I saw.

Anyway, I've also been having trouble voting. Last night I couldn't vote at all. This morning I voted for one article, and that seems to have worked. Then I viewed another article and the widget on that page said "You voted!" even though I hadn't. Then I went back to the original article, which let me vote again, except that when I reloaded the page it turned out I hadn't really voted.

Since you know there are issues with the voting, I think the most fair thing to do would be to disable it for everyone until you get all the bugs fixed.

Thanks!

Ryan Anderson's picture
Almost everyone I have sent the link to has had trouble voting, so I think it is affecting more than just 40 out of 35,000 people (there were really 35,000 views of the contest entries? Wow!)

Anyway, thanks for looking into the problem! I see that voting is disabled right now, which makes sense to me. Better to start over with a clean slate once we know it is working.

Thanks again!

If this article is the only one that has had 40 people complain that they cannot vote, it seems like it is not fair to this author.

Ryan Anderson's picture
Mine is not the only one that has been having problems. Hang in there, they are working on fixing it!

Ryan Anderson's picture
Looks like voting is back up. Turns out it was counting votes all along, just not refreshing.

I was able to vote yesterday but not today. Sound like you need to start the voting all over once the problem is solved.

Hfarmer's picture
Great post.   What are the odds in vegas that the MSL will suffer catastrophic failure in the landing phase.   Could they have come up with a more complex way to land a craft? 

Before anyone says... well why haven't you had a better idea.  It's not my job to come up with ways to land spacecraft.  let's just say, when it comes to robotic space-craft, I like landing systems which take advantage of nature, and don't involve computers making complex split second decisions.  Like, I don't know, some kind of nearly passive glider style landing, or something of that nature.

Man if something goes wrong with MSL there is no way the current administration would let us send another rover remotely like it.  Especially one which would be nuclear powered.

Ryan Anderson's picture
Yeah, the landing system is absolutely terrifying. But then again, the current rovers arrived by bouncing in big trapezoidal airbags, and that worked beautifully. So for us scientists involved in the mission, we just have to trust the engineers when they say it will work.

The system isn't complex just for the coolness factor. This method allows the landing system to be super-accurate. The MER rovers had landing ellipses about 100 km long. MSL has an uncertainty of about 30 km.

As for nuclear power on rovers. It is pretty standard for deep space missions to have a plutonium power source. It's not enough to work as a weapon or to undergo fission, and the electricity generators on space missions are also really excellent containment units in case of any mishap.

Hfarmer's picture
You and I know why nuclear power is necessary for a serious deep space mission.  The problem is we have to sell that to the general public, which won't even let us build nuclear plants on earth.  To average joe voter, the word nuclear means only one of two things.

Either This



Or this



I just really hope this works while we have the shot.

Ryan Anderson's picture
Me too: my career depends on it!

How do you vote???

Ryan Anderson's picture
There have been some technical difficulties with voting, so it is closed until they are resolved. Try again tomorrow! Thanks for your patience!

Ryan Anderson's picture
Voting is back up! Don't worry if you don't see a number of votes. They changed it so that only the author of that post can see it.

I'm afraid, I don't think the widget is working yet. An interesting read, and a blog worth voting for.

so lately I tried voting and when I clicked it it didn't switch to "you voted" Maybe it only does it once per day and I'm accidenally trying a second time for the day? but I feel like it should pop up "you've already voted" rather than nothing.

Ryan Anderson's picture
Hmm. If it hasn't been 24 hours since your last vote it should still say "You've voted." I noticed it was slow to update this morning when I voted, so try clicking and giving it a little time to change. If it still doesn't work, contact the scientificblogging staff or let me know and I'll contact them...

Hank's picture
Individual browsers, operating systems, patches, security settings and add-ons are all too varied to make a voting system that doesn't require a login and won't be open to cheating difficult to manage, but only graphically, because browsers dislike turning over too much to outside parties - we know the votes are being counted even if the little graphic doesn't show it in a browser.    The vote resets at midnight.

Ryan Anderson's picture
Ok, thanks! So, KevinAnd (and others) just go ahead and click to vote, it should be counting even if it doesn't update.

Well written - interesting to read- Good luck!

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.