Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Jon Lederman | February 6th 2009 09:11 AM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Jon Lederman articles

All

About Jon Lederman

I am inspired both by the elegance of theoretical physics as well as the creative application of applied science and technology in solving interesting problems. Theoretical science pervades many... Full Bio

The December '08 issue of symmetry magazine (http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/pdfs/200812/dec_2008.pdf) presents an interesting article about the benefits of particle physics research to society from an economic, social and education perspective.  

The ripple effect of basic research in physics such as elementary particles has driven development of technologies as far ranging as grid computing, superconductivity, cancer therapies and of course the World-Wide-Web.  Many of these breakthroughs might never have arisen under an incremental approach motivated purely by a corporate bottom line.  

These types of arguments are critical in making the case for fundamental scientific research in physics and other areas that don't immediately lend themselves to public favor due to their perceived "ivory tower" nature.  This is particularly urgent with the promise of a new administration and genuine government recognition of the economic, social and educational benefits of science particularly in the alternative and green energy areas.

Technologies we have come to love and rely upon in modern life that ultimately rely upon "academic" research abound. The GPS system and special and general relativity, air travel routes and geodesics, quantum tunneling, modern telecommunications and Shannon's theorem are but a few.  


Comments

Stellare's picture
Basic research is as pivotal today as it has proven to be in the past. We cannot predict theoretical physics applications immediately and this is often misunderstood as 'completely useless' to the less educated (in any meaning of the word).

I've heard people argue against doing hard science because they want to do something for people. What would modern medicine be without maths and physics, I ask?

Particle physics serves society just as much as any other field of science, perhaps even more! :-))

Hank's picture
I maintain the issue is not more government funding for basic science but less.    America's greatest science advancements were done when basic research funding by the private sector was much higher - the perception that corporations do not do basic research is somewhat accurate, but that's because it would be stupid to spend money on basic research if the government will do it for you.

If the government stopped, industry would do it again and budgets and expenditures would actually be a lot more predictable, since they don't rely on taxes to get funding.

Obviously that's a contrarian view on a site full of scientists who work in academia but I've never been at a company where less 50% of the expenditure was R&D - and only one time in 10 years was any of that DARPA money, because it was too big a hassle.

Stellare's picture
If we are solely guided by what the markets think they need we will put brakes on the development of technology. How big a percentage and who's funding what are other issues. I insist however that basic science is pivotal for our society for all sorts of utilitarian as well as cultural reasons.

jon2718's picture
The free market approach to funding scientific research fails on edge cases - namely those where the perceived economic benefits of the research are too indefinite either substantively or in terms of the time horizon.  Elementary particle research and theoretical condensed matter research are two such instances.  Alternative energy may be another.  In these edge cases, the only hope is some type of government initiative to propel these endeavors.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.