But critics of biofuels are as vocal as their advocates. One concern is that, globally, there will be a trade-off between using land to grow food and using it to grow fuel.
"If biofuels take off, they will cause a global humanitarian disaster," said environmentalist and writer George Monbiot in a November 2004 article in UK newspaper The Guardian. Monbiot argued that vast tracts of agricultural land in developing countries would be used to produce biodiesel for car-loving nations instead of food for the poor.
"People who own cars have more money than people at risk of starvation," he wrote. "In a contest between their demand for fuel and other people's demand for food, the car-owners win every time."
Others say that the energy, water and other inputs needed to grow biofuel crops exceed the energy value of the fuel produced. According to research published in July 2005 by David Pimentel of Cornell University and Tad Patzek of the University of California, Berkeley, producing biodiesel from soybeans requires 27 per cent more energy than the biodiesel generates — and the source of the energy used is polluting fossil fuels. For sunflower biodiesel, the figure is 118 per cent.
But jatropha can grow on poor-quality land unsuitable for food crops and needs little water or fertilisers. Nor does it need pesticides. In fact, jatropha deters pests — birds, mammals and insects do not eat it.
Pimentel says jatropha "sounds interesting and appears to have potential. I like the idea of controlling soil erosion and increasing the habitat for wild animals.''
Although native to Central America, jatropha is now found throughout the tropics, and its use as a source of biodiesel is not confined to Malawi. Ibrahim's activities are part of a ripple spreading across the developing world. In 2005 alone, new efforts to encourage farmers to adopt the plant were announced in Burkina Faso, Ghana, India, Nicaragua and Nepal, among others.
According to official estimates, India has about 40 million hectares of 'wasteland' — 14 per cent of the country's total area — that could be fully or partially cultivated with jatropha.
The Indian government's Vision 2020 document says that cultivating ten million hectares with jatropha would generate 7.5 million tonnes of fuel a year, creating year-round jobs for five milllion people.
In April 2005, Labland Biotechs, based in the south Indian city of Mysore, signed a contract with the one of the world's main biodiesel companies, UK-based D1 Oils, to supply about 100 million jatropha plants and 150,000 tonnes of jatropha oil, valued at US$50 million.
Labland Biotechs will use tissue culture techniques to produce clones of the best-quality jatropha trees.
In October, D1 Oils announced it would commission its first refinery for producing biodiesel from jatropha in Chennai early next year.
But elsewhere in India, things are not going to plan. In 2003, the country's Planning Commission proposed increasing the proportion of biofuels used in India from five to 20 per cent by 2012. The commission was due to launch a 'biofuels mission' in April 2005, but this has been delayed (see India's biofuel plans hit roadblock).
In the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, a classic 'chicken-and-egg' scenario is playing out, according to reports in the local media. In July, it was reported that until farmers begin growing jatropha, investors are unwilling to fund refineries. But without infrastructure to refine jatropha oil, farmers are unwilling to take the plunge and begin growing the trees.
Back in Malawi
Jatropha trees are already widely grown as a kind of 'living fence' throughout Africa, where parts of the trees are also used in traditional medicine. According to a Biodiesel Agricultural Association survey, more than one million jatropha trees are now growing in Malawi.
But that is just the beginning. Ibrahim's organisation is encouraging rural communities to plant the trees on all marginal land, where other crops cannot survive. He expects the area of Malawi planted with jatropha to increase over the coming year to cover an estimated area of more than 200,000 hectares.
The Biodiesel Agricultural Association gives Malawian farmers jatropha trees to plant and teaches them about biodiesel production. Ibrahim is working on this with the UK-based Climate Change Corporation, set up by two founder members of D1 Oils. The two organisations have an agreement. The Climate Change Corporation funds the Biodiesel Agricultural Association's tree-planting schemes. In return, the corporation says it will buy and refine the jatropha oil produced, and sell it on to EU biodiesel producers, with whom it already has contracts.
Paul Webb of the Climate Change Corporation says the company has secured agreements with rural communities to plant jatropha on 20,000 hectares of land. It has also signed contracts with two of Malawi's leading tobacco companies to plant the trees on their land.
"This is community empowerment at its best," says Ibrahim. "The Biodiesel Agricultural Association neither buys nor leases land from the people. Both the trees and the land belong to the people. There are no strings attached."
Source: http://www.scidev.net/Features/index.cfm?
Comments
Some good things about juniper oil are the nice smell, and the fact that producing it for fuel doesn’t cause some neighbor down the road to starve.
Synthesis gas reforming is a faster operation and often a better choice than biogas, or an addition to biogas in communities that can support a somewhat higher technology with high temperatures and pressure vessels. The big advantage is that syn gas can take almost any combustible material, where biological systems are limited by selectivity. Reformer technology is improving with new catalysts that are specific for certain types of products. Projects of this type tend to be part of the more heavily industrialized regions.
Fermentation and biological digestion have high technology needs more than biogas, but less than synthesis gas. The big improvements there are toward more biological digestion of cellulose as a gradual replacement or supplement to the fermentation of starches and sugars. A lot of research is being done and many small companies are working to convert cellulose to glucose, by processes that are similar to the internal working of cattle. The technology is available for cellulose and some few plants are being built. Food processing companies and mechanized agricultural regions tend to be the leaders in these technologies.
These are the big three choices for waste materials where the technology is available and the economics are viable on a local or regional basis. I work in all of these technologies and others that were not part of your question.
Tamarisk is one I don't know much about. The only person I know of who intentionally planted it was a government employee who had reached retirement age.
Mesquite has many uses, but is also one of the worst invaders. I've never heard anyone object to cutting one down. Mesquite is usually a bush sized plant with very big thorns, and seed pods of the legume family, but it can become a tree. The biggest one I personally cut down was about 2 feet in diameter and considerably more work than expected. Mesquite produces yellow flowers, two types of medicines in leaves and seeds, a type of fragrance, an edible starch flour in the seed pods, a resin, and wood products for fuel and construction.
So why is mesquite not loved until after it is dead? The answer is that there can just be too much of anything. Then it becomes a nuisance. A large amount of mesquite goes to waste after it is cut down.
For the most part corn oil is sold on fixed price contract at a substantial premium to diesel fuel, maybe 30% to 50%%, but there is usually a surplus or a shortage depending on what the spot market is doing, so the premium can be larger or smaller, maybe 20% to 80%.
The starch ethanol part of the grain is the one that sells at a big discount to crude oil and gasoline, over shadowing the smaller volume of corn oil. The market is totally inefficient. That's why the farming communities are building so many ethanol plants. It's the only way to get a fair price.
Alternative fuels would benefit from more orderly and better regulated markets, as would most other businesses.
One visitor from abroad visited a house in a village where the lady was cooking on small chulah with cowdung and firewood causing lot of smoke in the closed room His children were also inhaling the smoke The expert ask why not you have improved chullah with a chmney to avoid fumes. The fellow colleague pointe out there was one such chullah in the corner of the room.
Now what the women needed was education to use the chullah.
I highly appreciate your comments but more than technology almost two third of the worlds population needs to be educated about climate , pollution and how to avoid it , greening of earth and use of wastematerial. Thanks for comments.
By the way how about using halophytes as source of biofuel we have plenty of marshy lands and halophytes could be good source of biofuel in coastal areas and deserts of middle east .
Halophytes in North America are either in the western deserts, like tamarisk, or in fragile ecological zones of the eastern cost lands like marginal mangroves. Naturalized tamarisk is not recommended for planting because it takes salt from far underground and puts it on the surface. I don't have expertise in Tamarisk, but have been told that it is used as a fuel for heat and cooking in some desert regions.
The mangroves are largely unavailable because of habitats and biological diversity they support.
Algae sometimes occurs in excess in the seas, and there is not much objection to harvesting it. In addition to fuel it will also produce antifreeze and some other specialized products.
I guess there is a future for algae based food and fuel, based on reasonable extension of existing technology, and new scientific work that is supported on the Pacific cost.
Agar is a type of food in East Asia derived from certain types of algae and seaweed. Mostly it is a carbohydrate structure made up of galactose sugar, with which I have professional experience.
I doesn't ferment with yeast, but is decomposed by bacteria where it provides a laboratory standard substrate for cell culture.
Galactose is tolerated by some people as a sugar, others as a dietary fiber, but milk intolerant people cannot digest it without supplemental enzymes., or other processing to transform the galactose.
Agar can be used in making biogas, as long as a suitable cell culture is added. This is one resource that has not been fully explored.
Once again, the choice will be between fuel or food, because agar can serve both purposes.
Agar is a type of food in East Asia derived from certain types of algae and seaweed. Mostly it is a carbohydrate structure made up of galactose sugar, with which I have professional experience.
I doesn't ferment with yeast, but is decomposed by bacteria where it provides a laboratory standard substrate for cell culture.
Galactose is tolerated by some people as a sugar, others as a dietary fiber, but milk intolerant people cannot digest it without supplemental enzymes., or other processing to transform the galactose.
Agar can be used in making biogas, as long as a suitable cell culture is added. This is one resource that has not been fully explored.
Once again, the choice will be between fuel or food, because agar can serve both purposes.










The energy balance of biodiesel from soybeans has been greatly improved in the past few years in reply to the quotation.
“According to research published in July 2005 .... producing biodiesel from soybeans requires 27 per cent more energy than the biodiesel generates .... and the source of the energy used is polluting fossil fuels”
This type of claim has been with us for more than 20 years, and is almost always years out of date by the time it is published. The net result is to put the USA behind other countries in developing energy independence. Claims like this would have succeeded in stopping progress completely, but someone from Brazil always disproves the claim before the ink is dry on the paper. It is really embarrassing to always be looking to less wealthy countries for technology advances.
Process technology for soy beans is being redesigned every two years, so the newest plants are now 2 generations more advanced than the quotation. This is the type of work I do every year. The problems are resolved soon after they are identified, and long before the claim reaches public view.
The remedy is energy conservation and reuse by heat pumps, double and triple effects, sometimes three or four effects, combined with biofuel from the glycerol part of the oil that does not go into the biodiesel. These things can be found in government reports from several years ago. Glycerol is produced in excess and there is a surplus of hot water.
Soy beans give other products for food after oil has been removed. In the latest market reports, soy beans are selling for $9.97 per bushel while corn costs $3.82, showing the difference in value. Corn oil is also used in biodiesel with all of the same arguments, but not to the same volume that soy bean oil is used.
It is totally misleading to consider the oil conversion business without reference to the total mix of products that come from soy beans and corn.
If you remember that corn and beans form much of the diet for people of developing countries, then the food versus fuel argument really becomes a crisis. Other issues of environment and energy balance can be solved with technology.
A scarcity of food and the resulting price increase is the real issue, and the largest part of that has not occurred yet. It will happen when the economic recession ends. Projects for jatropha oil, or juniper oil, or what ever the local climate can support, make a lot of sense, especially for the local communities that are benefiting. It is not the total solution, but an important part of the solution, and it brings some local control to energy policies that would otherwise be out of control.