Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Bernard Horvath | February 6th 2009 12:11 PM | 1 comment | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Home and School Science Activities articles

All

About Bernard Horvath

I am a physical science teacher of grades 7-9 and have written, "Home and School Science Activity Books" Vol. 1 and 2. I have a Master's Degree in Education plus 30 additional hours. My personal... Full Bio

Finding Evidence Without An Eyewitness




Hi, my name is Bernie Horvath, I am the author of The Home and School Science Activity Books, Volumes I and II.

My goal today is to demonstrate by simple experiments that we can prove that things exist without seeing them. You just have to be looking for evidence and ask yourself some questions.

Did you ever wonder how a person could be convicted of a crime when no one saw them commit the crime? Your first thought may be fingerprints, which is an excellent idea. What if the criminal was wearing gloves? Hmmm!

In a science reference book, you can find this information:
  • 1. Heat makes molecules move farther apart
  • 2.  Heat makes molecules move faster
  • 3.  No one has ever seen things like a water molecule.

If no one has ever seen a water molecule, how do they know that they exist? Well, it is from something called circumstantial evidence. What is that, you ask? It is when events such as a crime or information about molecules are discovered because of what information you can observe.

A person is found with $50,000 and the bank reported that $50,000 had been stolen that day. The police have the serial numbers of the bills. That is circumstantial evidence.

Here is an easy experiment you can do at home. You will need some hot and cold water, 2 identical drinking glasses, a measuring cup, a watch or clock with a second hand and some food coloring.

1. Get two identical drinking glasses and place a half of cup of water in each of them. One glass should contain cold water from your faucet and the other hot water from your faucet. BE CAREFUL WITH THE HOT WATER! Kids, do this one with teacher or parental supervision.

2. Place two drops of food coloring in each glass. Do Not touch either glass.

3. Time how long it takes for each of the food colorings to spread their color throughout the glasses.

You should have noticed that the food coloring spreads throughout the glass without any stirring or help or your part. Does it make sense to say that something in the water is making the food coloring spread out? A scientist would say that whatever it is that is moving to cause the food coloring to spread out are particles (molecules), even if we can’t see them.

You should have also observed that the food coloring in the glass with hot water spread out sooner than the one with cold water. That is circumstantial evidence that heat makes molecules move faster. The color change to an even color throughout is also evidence of molecules spreading out evenly.

To summarize what we have learned:

1. The fact that the food coloring spreads out without being touched would lead us to conclude that something is moving in the water. If we mention the word “something”, we are saying a particle, even if it is too small to see. These particles are called molecules. This circumstantial evidence also demonstrates part of the kinetic-molecular theory that heat makes molecules move faster and farther apart.

2. The fact that the food coloring spreads out faster in the hot water is circumstantial evidence that heat makes molecules move faster. We can also notice this when water is at a rolling boil. The water moves faster as it gets hotter. It also starts to evaporate which is an example of molecules moving farther apart. In fact, in a change of state from a liquid to a gas, water will increase its volume about 1600 times.

3.You can also check out the experiment of collecting some smoke and looking at it under a microscope. The particles are all moving about. This is called Browniian motion. It demonstrates that something is making these smoke particles move about. Science believes that this movement is caused by particles too small to be seen (molecules).

Check out this website for a video of Einstein’s explanation of Browniian motion:

http://www.phys.virginia.edu/classes/109N/more_stuff/Applets/brownian/brownian.html  In this video, the blue dots would represent the smoke particles being moved about by the smaller particles – molecules.



Scientists have gathered a lot more circumstantial evidence that is consistent with the theory that heat makes molecules move faster and farther apart.  Every bit of that evidence leads to the fact that molecules exist even though we may not be able to see them.




Comments

Bernie, what you present as circumstantial evidence is an illusion. That you find someone with the money does not yet mean he has stolen it. Not by a long shot. There are millions of possible reasons why that person has the money. Even the information from the bank that the money was stolen could be wrong.

Brownian motion is not proof for atoms or anything else. It is just caused by thermal processes.

We believe today that solid MATTER (molecules or atoms) do not exist. The Standard Model has identified 16 types of energetic interactions that are considered responsible for the way an atom works. What has not been discovered is the functionality that actually produces mass and gravity - the core properties of matter. On this low quantum mechanical level everything is considered to be energy field or higher order gauge fields. The complete detection process of particles on this low level is only possible by using complex probability calculations on the observed radiation. There is no proof and there is very little circumstantial evidence.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.