Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By T. Ryan Gregory | May 8th 2008 05:03 PM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
About T. Ryan

I am an evolutionary biologist specializing in genome size evolution at the University of Guelph in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Be sure to visit

...

View T. Ryan's Profile

I am swamped at present and have not had time to discuss the recent publications about the platypus genome. I had planned to wait and to talk about some interesting aspects, but the headlines are just too crazy to ignore. Fortunately, I believe Nimravid will be covering it soon and John Timmer gives a reasonable introduction. Some of the nonsense is from press interpretation, but some I think relates to the generally poor grasp of evolution that I see in many genomics articles. Phylogenetic fallacies aplenty.

By far the worst headline-

Gene map proves platypus is part bird, mammal and reptile (USA Today, reposted uncritically at RichardDawkins.net)

 


Comments

Hank's picture
As soon as I saw your title I had a feeling of dread. It's only a matter of time before you turn the guns on us.

You'll be happy to note that while USA Today editing is suspect (unless they syndicate your next article, in which case they are quite astute) educated science readers at Slashdot chose our version for their audience - 'Patchwork' DNA - Genome Of Platypus Decoded.

You can get away with almost anything if you put it in single quotes.

T Ryan Gregory's picture
The long blog post, if I had time, would have been "Phylogenetic fallacies: the case of the patchwork platypus"!

Hank's picture
Mike says he is going to do one. I am trying to convince him to keep this as his opening:

"I haven't contributed a single thing to the platypus genome project, but since I sit one floor above where it was sequenced, I consider myself somewhat of an authority on the subject, and here's what's wrong with other people's ideas about it."

But he says he was just kidding. It parallels most of the stories I have seen nicely.

adaptivecomplexity's picture
Yeah, the headlines are absurd. I'll have some comments tonight.

OK Hank, you've convinced me to keep the line!

Mike

Actually, after skimming the article, I'm not sure if the title bugs me as much as USA Today's insistence on using the meaningless 'Scientists believe...' rather than 'All observable evidence points to/suggests/agrees/etc.'. It's depressing.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.