For those of you who still are not reading Evolution: Education and Outreach, here's another reason to check it out.Eugenie Scott and Glenn Branch of the National Center for Science Education have a nice article coming out in the next issue entitled Don't call it Darwinism. It is already free to access in preprint.
While you're at it, you can have a look at the special issue on eye evolution, and my first contribution to a series entitled "Evolutionary Concepts" on artificial selection.
_______________________________________________________
Click here to shop for your Darwin Year gear











I'm reading Jerry Coyne's new book 'Why evolution is true?' for Darwin Day and it is littered with references to 'Darwinism', which leads to my point - getting rid of a term because creationists conscript it is reactionary. Nothing that becomes colloquial is used consistently. Should we get rid of 'evolution' because everyone from car makers to sous chefs uses it? Nope, and so it goes with Darwinism. We owe the big guy a lot and if someone wants to refer to gravity as Newtonism I am okay with that too.
Yes, there are small fights that still occur here and there but this is not 1920. Science won. It's time to act like winners and that means not having biologists abandom terms if a creationist tries to use it as an insult. It goes to a weird places when opponents dictate the language in use.