Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Garth Sundem | February 13th 2007 12:47 PM | 12 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More The Geeks' Guide to World Domination articles

All

About Garth Sundem

Do you need a Monday morning shot of geekery?

If so, you've come to the right place. Every Monday, early, I'll drop splendid geekery from the fields of physics, math, computer science, zoology


... Full Bio

While I'm safely removed from the dating pool, Stephanie Street is not (is this perhaps a pseudonym?). She phoned in a Valentine's Day question to the PRI radio program Fair Game, and won the dubious honor of chatting with me and the host on air (tonight, online at www.morefairgame.org by 9:00pm) and thus having her pseudonym forever attached to this equation, heretofore known as The Manometer. Her dilemma was the choice between two proposed Valentine's Day dates—one eight years older, mature and stable and another two years younger, brash and exciting (does this sound like the plot of a Danielle Steel novel to anyone else?). The older gent was thinking basketball game while the younger had gone with the standby wine-and-dine.


Which to choose? Luckily the revolutionary Man-O-Meter makes Stephanie's decision easy (and maybe yours, too). Just plug in the numbers to rank each dude and go with the one that scores highest. And guys—it doesn't take a PhD in String Theory to switch the genders, just be careful with the age variables.


Man-O-Meter
Which date should I accept this Valentine’s Day?


 

•    D= How much would you enjoy the activity he proposed? (1-10 with 10 being “private jet to Milan”)
•    H= How hot is the guy? (1-10 with 10 being “magma”)
•    F= How fun is he? (1-10 with 10 being “Pee Wee’s Big Adventure”)
•    S= How stable is he? (1-10 with 10 being “the pyramids at Giza” and 1 being “the Leaning Tower of Pisa”)
•    C= How compatible are you with him (education, life goals, etc.)—1-10 with 10 being “Bogey and Bacall”
•    I= What are your intentions? (1-10 with 1 being “keep the Valentine’s blues away” and 10 being “for better or for worse”)
•    AY= Your age
•    AG= Guy’s age
•    T= How traditional are you? (1-10 with 10 being “Little House on the Prairie” and 1 being “The Osbournes”)

VD stands for Valentine’s Date (of course) and is this guy’s score. Do the equation again and then go out with the guy who scores most.

What this equation says:
•    Hot and funny are always good, but if your intentions are especially lascivious, these two variables (in conjunction with how fun is the proposed activity) pretty much drive the equation
•    Compatible and stable are good, but only if your intentions go beyond Valentine’s Day
•    Age similarity is good. As you both get older, this matters less. If you are quite traditional, it’s good if the guy is a bit older.

Comments

Hank's picture
ALL scientists are hot and funny. According to this equation, the line of women waiting to date us is so long it can be seen from space!

Great article!

I'm glad you didn't include the scores for other men. I am worried my wife would see this and I might be below Jeffrey Dahmer.

Garth Sundem's picture

You're right—maybe I needed a variable for "likelihood he/she will consume you at date's end". This (hopefully) would have helped you edge past Dahmer... 

Garth Sundem, itinerant math geek, pop pseudo-psychologist, and author of Geek Logik: 50 Foolproof Equations for Everyday Life


Administrator's picture
We have LaTeX if you need to do maths. Right now that graphic is way down below the bio because the bio is long. We could just leave bios on the profile page, but people coming from outside might only go to a specific page and we wanted to have them able to see the other works from the authors.

We can also resize the graphic so it fits the width but I don't want to do that without asking.

Nicely done, but you might want to reconsider how you name your variables! The tool for doing the, ahem, "Valentine's Date" math is up here.

Garth Sundem's picture

Ha! I'm glad you got the joke! It didn't happen this way, but here's how it was supposed to go down:


Interviewer: "So, what does VD equal?"


Me: "Well, probably no second date." 


Uprorious laughter (or at least a good groan). 

Garth Sundem, itinerant math geek, pop pseudo-psychologist, and author of Geek Logik: 50 Foolproof Equations for Everyday Life


Cash's picture
Hey, that's pretty slick, Ironman. None of us want to actually write that stuff out.

However, I looked at your hybrid v combustion only calculator and you only factor gas. How can you do a comparison without mentioning the higher base price for hybrids, the maintenance, or the eventual parts replacement cost?

Adding that in, hybrids don't make sense unless gas is around $5 a gallon.

About Hybrid vs Standard Cars...

Cash,

You are correct. In our original commentary below the hybrid vs. standard car comparison tool, you'll find those exact points made (there are also differences in the cost of insurance too.)

Fortunately, we came back to the topic for our tool that asked: "Should you trade in your old gas guzzler!"

Cash's picture
Oh. That's some elaborate SEO you have going there. People have to keep clicking on new articles to converge on the right answer. We need more of that here. Each of our articles should be cut into 10 pieces, like MSNBC and those guys do, and make you click through each page.

Nah, forget the money. Let's just keep writing good science.

I can't (and won't) speak for MSNBC's site, but I'll agree that it's not meant for people who want to get the whole story quickly.

For Political Calculations, a lot of what we do revolves around asking questions that we don't know the answer to, answering it for ourselves, then setting up a tool so anyone asking the same question can get an answer that allows them to take their own unique situations into account.

Sometimes we'll go back to a topic since we realize that there are other factors or things to consider that our original tool didn't take into account. That's where the "gas guzzler" tool came from!

It's only been in recent weeks that Blogger has allowed us to add tags to the posts, which should help readers better find our related posts on similar topics. It's definitely a pain trying to keep just the index for our tools up to date manually!

Hank's picture
I do think it's neat you can add the numbers right into blogger.

Kimberly Crandell's picture
So, hot and funny... good.
Compatible and stable... good.
Take the square root of the age differential, sprinkled with a spoonful of tradition and you get... VD?
Wait... what??
Wow, I'm glad I'm married. Dating is even more confusing than I remember. Thank goodness you can step us through it, Garth!

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.