Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Hatice Cullingford | October 12th 2008 09:36 AM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Fine Scientist articles

All

About Hatice Cullingford

Welcome to my universe.. where there is Peace University.

As Fine Scientist, PhD, I write about my interest in various fields, from energy to space, chemistry, mathematics, plants, paleontology... Full Bio

Simple. Have you heard that a National Biofuels Action Plan (NBAP) was released on 7 October 2008 in the midst of comparisons being made of the presidential-candidate positions on energy?

The NBAP was developed by the Biomass Research and Development Board (the Board)—co-chaired by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)— to accelerate the development of a sustainable biofuels industry.*

The Board establishes that enhanced inter-agency collaboration is required among the senior decision makers from ten federal agencies and the White House. The NBAP identified key research challenges and critical inter-agency actions to make next-generation, cellulosic biofuels cost-effective.

Seven action areas include:

Sustainability: A working group led by USDA, DOE, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is defining science-based national criteria, which will be established by November 2008, and indicators to assess the sustainability of biofuels production coordinated with ongoing international activities.

Feedstock Production: A Board-commissioned inter-agency working group conducted a feedstock availability and cost study using the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) production targets. A separate Board working group is developing a long-term integrated feedstock research and development plan across the federal government, which will reach completion by December 2008.

Feedstock Logistics: A working group led by USDA will facilitate collaboration to develop and deploy logistics systems that can supply cellulosic feedstocks to demonstration facilities.

Conversion Science and Technology: A working group composed of DOE, USDA, EPA, National Science Foundation (NSF), and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is collaborating to develop a 10-year federal science and technology research plan by December 2008 for developing cost-effective means of biomass conversion and production of cellulosic biofuels.

Distribution Infrastructure: A U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)-led group is studying the feasibility of transporting ethanol in pipelines and assessing the availability of geographic information system (GIS) capabilities across agencies.

Blending: The Board has approved a statement on blending ethanol with gasoline in amounts greater than 10 percent (E10) and will review results of an inter-agency testing program to evaluate the impact of intermediate blends on vehicle emissions and material compatibility by fall 2008.

Environment, Health and Safety: An EPA-led working group is inventorying federal activities and areas of jurisdiction with respect to public health, safety, and environmental protection.

(*) http://www.energy.gov/news/6634.htm

Comments

Thanks for writing this Hatice. I'm glad the government is setting up committees to study the problem. We should get some action in several years. Adding more corn-made ethanol to gasoline is the wrong direction to go. This only helps sell more oil and raises the price of food, although it keeps the farmers happy. Plugin hybrid automobiles and development of other energy sources besides biofuels is the only solution. This is so obvious it does not take a committee to debate the issue.

Hatice Cullingford's picture
Thank you very much. This might be the first time in history that a people food (corn) is burned (in essence) at large scale day after day. Silent suffering goes on elsewhere while engines roar to get errands done. Do we question enough our intent in new actions?

'Yes' to other energy sources if they meet the requirements. Bring them on. Any new energy ideas?

Hatice

Well Hatice, several new and novel energy sources are being explored. One of them is often called "cold fusion", an idea that was initially rejected but has now been found to be real. Indeed, once the method to fuse deuterium using a solid environment is mastered, the method will provide the ideal source of energy. Go to www.LENR.org for more information or buy my book, "The Science of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction" from Amazon.com.

Hatice Cullingford's picture
Thanks. I am delighted with your news and information. I wonder if you would take the time to give more details here. Cold fusion is not in the radar of most people these days, right?

Incidentally, is an article or a blog a possibility?

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.