Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Nicholas Horton | March 20th 2009 01:00 PM | 1 comment | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Evolutionary Economics articles

All

About Nicholas Horton

I'm a graduate student in mathematics at Portland State University. My areas of study are Quantum Game theory and Mathematical Biology with a focus in Evolution.

Outside of Math, my science interests... Full Bio

Humans belong to a sub-clasification of animals called deuterostomes (or second-mouth). During embryological development there is a period where part of the tissue “folds” back into itself creating what’s called a blastopore. The blastopore, in insects (and other members of the “other” group called protostomes, or first-mouth), forms the mouth. Not so for us and other deuterostomes. Oh, no. Our blastopore develops into the anus. We come out butt first.

For discussion on such phylogenetic fun and sillyness, I stumbled across this tidbit from Greg Morrow:


So that’s it for our animal family reunion: empty bags of water, worms with heads shaped like penises, and spiny things that hurt if you step on them. And all of us talk out of our ass.






Comments

rholley's picture
The odd thing is that it is the Bilateria which are divided into deuterostomes and protostomes.  I first learnt about this distinction when I read Ralph Buchsbaum's Animals Without Backbones in the early 60's.  However, still very much in the air at that time was Haeckel's doctrine ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny, which taught that embryonic development recapitulates the evolutionary development of the animal in question.  Applied to the proto/deuterostome division, that would produce a very far-reaching divergence between the two classes.

However, one finds that the HOX genes work similarly in mice and flies (see illustration in the Wikipedia article).  So the bilaterality of vertebrates and  arthropods goes deeper than the distinction in embryonic development.

But then, why shouldn't embryos evolve too?  Earlier today, I was reading about the very early development of the human embryo, and it is quite different from that of the chick embryos in the open eggs that we had at school many years ago, and very different from the tadpoles in frog spawn.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.