Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Nicholas Horton | May 8th 2009 01:37 PM | 1 comment | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Evolutionary Economics articles

All

About Nicholas Horton

I'm a graduate student in mathematics at Portland State University. My areas of study are Quantum Game theory and Mathematical Biology with a focus in Evolution.

Outside of Math, my science interests... Full Bio


The 66th Four Stone Hearth, a fortnightly collection of anthropology blogging is being hosted over at Aardvarcheology.  including a monster of a study on African population genetics.

Excerpt:

The scientists’ first step was to collect DNA from a diverse set of
Africans. Africa is the most culturally and linguistically diverse
place on Earth, so it was important to take a wide sample of
individuals from all corners of the continent. In total, they collected
2,432 DNA samples from 113 diverse and distinct groups of people from
across the African continent as well as 60 non-African groups. They
sampled everyone from the Mozabite Berbers of Morocco to the
hunter-gatherer San of the Kalahari Desert, and many in between.

But the hard work didn’t stop there. The scientists then examined
1,327 genetic markers across the human genome for each individual
studied. While many studies focus on a particular part of the genome
such the mitochondrial DNA or the Y chromosome, this study took a
comprehensive approach. Finally, the researchers used sophisticated
statistical techniques, piecing together how these populations from
Africa and around the world were the same, and how they were different.

The results confirmed that Africa has the highest genetic diversity
of any continent, as many scientists have proposed. In fact, the
authors found genetic diversity to decrease the further one traveled
away from Africa. Genetic diversity is often used as a measure of how
long ago humans inhabited a region — conventional wisdom places the
earliest humans in East Africa, which had exceptionally high genetic
diversity according to this study, though an analysis by the
researchers put the origin of the human expansion farther south near
the border of Namibia and Angola.




And a hat-tip on this crazy-ass picture:



Comments

Is the genetic diversity "gradient" more or less continuous as one moves away from Africa? Or are there steep drop-offs?

Also, could lower diversity found among Europeans and Asians be the result of bottlenecks?

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.