There are now several available articles that discuss this important subject:
- Evolution as fact, theory, and path (T. Ryan Gregory)
- Evolution as fact and theory (Stephen Jay Gould)
- Evolution: fact and theory (Richard E. Lenski)
- Evolution is a fact and a theory (Laurence A. Moran)
- The fact of evolution: implications for science education (James R. Hoffman and Bruce H. Weber)
- What is fact without theory? (Brian J. Switek)









Stephen Gould's article emphasizes that new evidence contrary to the theory of evolution should be welcomed by science. It is not. Even the well-known evidence of "co-evolution" and "convergent evolution," which characterize all the life on Earth and fly in the face of expectations of undirected evolution (and in many instances, fairly shout "design"), are today illogically considered part of the "overwhelming evidence for evolution".
Here is new evidence, that demolishes the foundations of both plate tectonics and undirected evolution: www.lulu.com/hdhsciences. I am one of many scientists and other seekers of truth who have been and are suppressed; the authors of these articles have no idea of the abuses they defend in the name of their dogmatic, unimaginative worldview. I will give a paid talk to any group that wants to hear and see new evidence. Until evolutionists, and all of science, confront the new evidence, journals like the one advertised here are mere isolationist defenses of a failed hypothesis.