Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Alex Antunes | October 27th 2009 01:31 PM | 7 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More The Daytime Astronomer articles

All

About Alex Antunes

In "The Sky By Day", Dr. Alex Antunes serves twice-weekly slices of life from the sometimes strange, sometimes oddly normal workday of a NASA astrophysicist. Readers get the inside scoop on what... Full Bio

Nothing happened Tuesday in space science, is the conclusion reached by this researcher. As a hard scientist here at ScientificBlogging, I find interesting topics to write about twice weekly. However, today, there was nothing. Nothing at all happened in science, at least involving space, or astronomy, or Mayans (who, according to /., apparently predicted the apocalypse in 2220, not 2012 as commonly misreported).

The NASA Ares-X launch was postponed due to bad weather and risk of triboelectrification. This NASA lead set the trend for 'nothingness' that continued up until I wrote this piece.

Physics Today reported that Hot dust evinces a violent planetary collision around a nearby star but really, that's too little, too late.

The latest issue of Astrophysical Journals notes a 500 parsec halo around a globular, some dwarf binary spectrography, and two models. Ho hum. Astronomy&Astrophysics notes transneptunian objects, planetary companions, exoplanets, and disks around other stars, but really, isn't that stuck in an 2008 mindset?  We're so over the Pluto/transneptunian thing, at the very least. And Astrophysical Journal ('ApJ', the 800-pound gorilla of astronomy research mags) notes, among other things, a novel theory saying the universe's first stars were powered by dark matter, not our ordinary nuclear fusion, and also almost a dozen dozen other results.

But I could not find one witty quip among those. Fortunately, though, a quick glance at "People" online leads that Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner are planning an African honeymoon. So at least the real magazines are tackling hard-hitting news, even while science flounders. For today, at least.

Alex, The Daytime Astronomer, Tues&Fri here, via RSS feed, and twitter @skyday
Read about my own private space venture in The Satellite Diaries

If TV science was more like real science

Comments

The Count's picture
Yeah, it's been slow for a while.  How's this?

I'm not a scientist, but I've been thinking about black holes and their relationship to the origin of the universe and would like to offer the following comments. I call it "Harold's Theory of Everything".

While we can observe an expanding universe that is still increasing the rate of it's expansion, what if all matter in the universe was gradually and inexorably destined to fall into a black hole of one size or another. Imagine a condition where there is nothing left in space except an unknown number of black holes with nothing to devour besides themselves. It would seem logical that one day only two unimaginably massive black holes are left standing, with a showdown at high noon pending. What if the Big Bang were the result of such an encounter, critical mass having been reached? Is it possible we live in a universe (whatever that is) whose matter undergoes an endless cycle of expansion into seemingly limitless space followed by condensation and contraction back to that point of singularity?

antunes's picture
Lets take your idea further.  Why are there black holes at all?  In fact, why does our universe have the particular physical constants-- Planck length, expansion constant, etc-- that it does?  There is a philosophical (speculative, not scientific) theory that each black hole spawns a new universe, which (being 'descended' from ours) carries the same physical laws, with perhaps only a minor difference or two.  Since our universe has/creates many black holes, it has many descendents.  Black holes in its descendent universes will create their own descendents, again carrying the same physical constants as their origin (with one or more tweaks).  So, like evolution, this means eventually most universe will be those which have physical constants that preferentially result in the creation of black holes.  Multiverse evolution theory in action.

:)
Alex


The Count's picture
I don't like this multiverse idea.  What sort of fabric would these thorny universes snag and tear?  What is a "universe", if not universal?   I realize my theory is just as speculative, but black holes do exist and matter does not appear to escape from them.  Who's to say if the expansion constant is indeed constant, or if it's apparent speed is just a function of current conditions or perspective?  And what if there is no such a thing as a "point of no return", which once passed would mean an infinitely expanding universe; it's gravitational bonds torn asunder?  I'm looking at the ultimate power of gravity as the driver here; the power to eventually rein in this runaway universe and bring it back to the corral where, just for kicks, we'll let her loose again.  Time will tell.

Einstein said "Those of who believe in physics know that time is only a persistent, obstinate illusion". If this is true then cause need not precede effect, I need not follow you, and we are all simultaneous, as are all orgasms that ever were.

The Count's picture
The concept of time is a human construct.  I believe that it is an attempt to anthropomorphize the mechanics of the universe; to impose order on apparent chaos.  Having said that, I see no better alternative and I can make no sense of the simultaneous existence of "all orgasms" (mine have not been simultaneous!).  Perhaps a finite amount of matter exists, but that matter appears to be constantly rearranging itself, and as Heraclitus said, we cannot step into the same river twice.  Or can we?  Perhaps there is no such thing as time, but only an infinity of endless possibilities.  Did you and I have this conversation before?  Are we destined to repeat it endlessly, with endless variations mixed in? 

Mankind is always searching for the ultimate explanation of everything.  We want a story with a beginning, a middle, and an end.  I don't think such a story exists.  We're on a loop.

um science stories happens EVERYDAY ! your not very thourough on your research before posting !

proof ? 

check the dates and days on the older news too ..lots of tuesdays to be found !

antunes's picture
Hi,
Actually, the title is tongue-in-cheek, as I reference 23 different science results in my article for that one day alone.  So I agree that science stories happen everyday... if you missed the 23 articles, just click through the links I cheerfully provided!
Alex


Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.