Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Alex Antunes | September 11th 2009 12:29 PM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More The Daytime Astronomer articles

All

About Alex Antunes

In "The Sky By Day", Dr. Alex Antunes serves twice-weekly slices of life from the sometimes strange, sometimes oddly normal workday of a NASA astrophysicist. Readers get the inside scoop on what... Full Bio

I'm in that awkward lull between proposals and actual cash in hand.  I call it freelancer hell.  But since I'm thinking about money, time for a look at how to fund success.

My own success record for funded projects is 100%.  When people pay me (and/or my team) for a specific project, we get it done.  This would be worth bragging about, save this is how it should be.

A project is something like "we launch in 2 years, make it work" or "get a best-fit model to this data" or even "get our books into distribution".  It's a task that-- no matter how hard it may be-- any professional should expect to succeed at.  You wouldn't want an accountant who says "no, I couldn't figure out your taxes after all" or a house painter that says "we stopped at wall 3, it was just too hard."  Most careers have a high success rate at the project level.

It's worth noting that projects do not mean discovery.  A project is an investigation.  A discovery is a particular form of unpredictable success.  So a research project might be to use Hidden Markov Methods to better predict CMEs.  'Success' means the method was implemented, tested, and compared against existing methods.  'Discovery' would be the result that the method outperforms existing methods.

Going back to the analogies, the investigation is like asking your accountant to do your taxes, and discovery is if they manage to find a way to get you a large refund.  The first is the agreed-upon task, the latter is the best of all possible results.

Things get harder to define at the strategic level.  You can apply Goethe's 3 review criteria to life and work: what are you doing, did you do it well, and was it worth doing?  Succeeding at a project is 'just' craftsmanship, item #2.  Doing it well.  What to do, generally, is mandated by the nature of the job, the work proposed when you wrote the grant, or the bidding of a higher-up.  Worth doing?  That's for history, or the marketplace, or the peer review committees to cover.

So when a capable scientist says they are about to embark on Project X, give them the benefit of the doubt that they'll succeed.  The real question should always be "why" and "what's the best outcome that might happen?"

Alex, the Daytime Astronomer

The Daytime Astronomer, Tues&Fri here, via RSS feed, and twitter @skyday

See also The Satellite Diaries, the diary of building our personal satellite.


Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.