Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Alex Antunes | June 19th 2009 07:21 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More The Daytime Astronomer articles

All

About Alex Antunes

In "The Sky By Day", Dr. Alex Antunes serves twice-weekly slices of life from the sometimes strange, sometimes oddly normal workday of a NASA astrophysicist. Readers get the inside scoop on what... Full Bio

Not all job rejections are equal. Being turned down from the 'Wally the Whale' fish sandwich stop at age 17, for example, was probably a blessing in disguise. Also humorous, as it was my first 'overqualified' experience-- I'd had 2 year's work at a seafood market prior.

That said, some jobs you just want more than others. I'm only a few weeks into my attempt at transitioning to a salaried science writing/web gig. So far the news is mixed. And mixed, as all job-hunters know, means either 'indetermined' or 'bad'.

Having just gotten the 'call of doom' from the first off my "really want" job list, though, I must say there are many bright sides to this. Here's my top 5 list on why job hunting rocks!
  1. Job hunting is just like shopping, and everyone loves shopping!
  2. I get to write more cover letters, which means talking about myself, whee!
  3. I can use the new, cool, trendy term 'funemployment'!
  4. I get to make a 'top 5 list', and everyone loves lists!
  5. I can misquote Nietzsche, ironically!


For anyone wondering whence the irony in that last one, Nietzsche is often misquoted as 'that which does not kill you makes you stronger'. But he wrote "that which does not kill me makes me stronger." He didn't care about you, after all. This makes him not as useful in job hunting as one might think, since job hunting is about joining a team, not callous self-development. So note to self, 'Nietzsche: not a team player'.

On the plus side, this is just rejection #1, I still have resumes out, people are sending me leads, and I've wrapped up a neat opinion piece, accepted into August's "Physics Today", on science and the web. I am and will be a science communicator. It's just a question of where and for how much.

      Sci writ ISO a salary, housebroken, friendly. Pls help, thx.

Alex, the daytime astronomer

The Daytime Astronomer, Tues&Fri here, via RSS feed, and twitter @skyday


Comments

Hank's picture
That's a pretty terrific list. Actually, I think you are doing it the right way, though you may not think you are because people are used to thinking in terms of salary.

The most successful writers aren't working for a company on retainer, they are writing freelance stuff and blogging while they also work on a book.

Someone like Greg Critser here has been at it a long time and he is always working on a book but he has also written for places like Harper's forever. Once you write a few things for an editor and they are well done and on time you will get regular gigs.

Bob Crouse from Stony Brook writes in Physics Today every month, for example, so they like his stuff.

You already have the technical credibility, so that is a boost. Imagine being me; I am sure I couldn't have gotten published anywhere so I had to create a place to be read. Though it's worked out pretty well, obviously.

antunes's picture
Hey Hank, thanks for the encouraging words.  Ironically, I've been published with over 100 articles in over dozen books, magazines and sites, including Science and CiSE and, next month, Physics Today.

Alas, not all were science (many were on gaming), so this site has been invaluable in letting me sand off any rough edges in my science writing style (plus it's fun!).  So much of my transition is not 'to become a writer', but to become a _science_ writer.  Because, as we all know, science writers are like unto gods.  We get all the fame, all the money, all the glory, all the MOTAS!  Just like... um... um... Sagan?  No, wait, he's dead.  I'm sure some names will come to me.

Wishes aside, I agree with your take that the freelance approach and building one's own platform/brand is the best approach in the long term, particularly given the modern economy.  If it were just about salary, I'd go back into programming.

But I also have a bit of the science zealot in me, and being in an outreach job isn't just about a steady salary, it's about disseminating a lot of great science out there that just isn't heard about.  It's what I want to do, but whether the best approach for me is freelance or staff, that's tbd.

Babbling on a saturday morn,
Alex, the daytime astronomer

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.