Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Alex Antunes | July 21st 2009 09:29 PM | 7 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More The Daytime Astronomer articles

All

About Alex Antunes

In "The Sky By Day", Dr. Alex Antunes serves twice-weekly slices of life from the sometimes strange, sometimes oddly normal workday of a NASA astrophysicist. Readers get the inside scoop on what... Full Bio

Apollomania is sweeping the nation! 

Well, not quite mania, perhaps just Apollostalgia.  That's defined as showing an interest in the Apollo program history, while lacking the will to actually recommit to exploring space. 

As we look at the 40th anniversary of humankind's first setting foot on a celestial body other than the Earth, I will state clearly that Apollo 12 was the peak of the Apollo program.

Now, it's true Apollo 11 is when humans first set foot on the moon.  It's Apollo 11's anniversary, it's getting the lion's share of the attention right now. 

But I maintain Apollo 12, launched a scant 4 months later, was the most important moon landing in all of history.  Let's review:

First humans set foot on the moon?  That was Apollo 11.
Biggest space rescue? Apollo 13.
First seismic studies? And first golf shot?  Apollo 14.
First moon buggy?  Apollo 15.
First visit to the lunar highlands?  Apollo 16.
First geologist on the moon?  Apollo 17.

So what the heck distinguishes Apollo 12, what makes it so tremendously important in the scheme of scientific history?

Apollo 12 proved that landing people on the moon was repeatable.  It taught us that Apollo 11 was not just a fluke, not a single ascent  The moon became, with Apollo 12, a viable, revisitable destination.  And if we can do it twice, we can keep doing it forever.



Science is all about repeatability.  A result observed just once is nigh useless.  At the risk of being repetitious, if it can't be repeated, it isn't science.
Apollo 12 logo
It helped that Apollo 12 was hit by lightning 36.5 seconds after launch.  Yes, helped-- it showed toughness.  Reliability.  Success in the face of adversity.  If a Saturn V can survive a lightning hit and still get 3 men to the Moon, why, nothing can stop us!

Nothing other than economics and politics, at least.  From a technical standpoint, the moon is a solved problem.  Apollo 12 proved that.  So I offer my thanks to Conrad, Gordon, Bean, and their ground crew, who showed us that the Moon truly can belong to anyone.

Alex, the daytime astronomer


The Daytime Astronomer, Tues&Fri here, via RSS feed, and twitter @skyday



Comments

Mr. Bean went to the moon?

antunes's picture
Mr. Bean went to the moon?


I'll simply note that Apollo 12 did indeed put the first human Bean on the moon.

Hank's picture
The coolest guy at Kennedy Space Center in the early 70s was ... 

... yep, me.

I would say Apollo XIV was the greatest, not only because of the golf ball but because after XIII it took a lot of courage to get back on that Rocketdyne horse.

Jeff Sherry's picture
Alex,  Apollo 11 after 40 years is still the height of  achievement in my mind. I still remember the words and images  as an 11 year old. In contrast the following moon landings blur in my memory. The only other comparable achievement may be Lindbergh's transatlantic flight or the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk.

antunes's picture
Apollo 11 after 40 years is still the height of  achievement in my
mind. I still remember the words and images  as an 11 year old. In
contrast the following moon landings blur in my memory.


Hi Jeff.  People's memories of Apollo 11 have huge personal and cultural value.  Memories are treasures.  And they are certainly a part of politics and space funding.

That said, though, memories and emotions are not science.  Put another way, the most remembered space shuttle flight is the Challenger disaster, but I would never suggest it was a scientific high point.

There is emotion in science, but emotion isn't science.  So I stand with Apollo 12 as the greatest technological achievement of mankind to date.

Jeff Sherry's picture

Alex I fail to see how Apollo 12 was a greater achievement Than 11. Repeatability was guaranteed with the completion of the Apollo 11 mission.



antunes's picture
Repeatability was guaranteed with the completion of the Apollo 11 mission.


Apollo was a tremendously complicated undertaking-- Apollo 13 illustrated that, even after Apollo 11, success was not a given.

I disagree that repeatability is ever guaranteed by a first success.  Beyond semantics, it's a question of theory versus practice.  In theory, these two are equal: do it once, you can do it again.  In practice, you need to really do it again to show it's stable and reliable.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.