Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By David Houle | February 5th 2007 07:04 AM | 20 comments | Track Comments

About David Houle

David Houle is a future thinker, speaker and strategist who advises organizations about dynamic trends. He is the author of The Shift Age.

More from David Houle

All

This post goes into that age old category of ‘learn something everyday’.  As regular readers of this blog know, I believe that we must do everything we can to both find alternative sources of energy and slow down the accelerating global warming trend. One of the key ways to accomplish both of these is through technological innovation.


 

A while ago I read an article in the New York Times that was nothing less than thrilling regarding technology and global warming.  Six years ago the architect Richard Meier designed a church in Rome.  The dominant design element was curvilinear white concrete.  To preserve the whiteness the primary technical sponsor worked on coming up with a coating for the concrete.  Six years later, the coated concrete is as white as it was when constructed, while other parts of the building have grayed due to atmospheric pollution.  Now the thrilling part:  the white pigment used actually ‘eats’ surrounding smog!


 

It was determined through testing that construction materials that contain titanium dioxide, the key ingredient in the pigment, destroy the pollutants found in car exhaust and heating emissions.  In other words, titanium dioxide breaks down the nitrogen oxides that are emitted by burning fossil fuels. It is called photocatalytic cement. The maker of the pigment, Italcementi, has conducted numerous tests that have determined that some pollutants could be reduced by 20 to 70 percent.  The reduction of pollutants is greatest within a distance of 8 feet.  In one test a 1,000 foot stretch of highway outside Milan, with a high level of vehicular traffic was paved with titanium dioxide and it was found that there was a 60 percent reduction of nitrogen oxides at street level. 


 

This is not only a wonderful unintended consequence, it really is an innovative technological breakthrough of the highest order in our effort to cut down or emissions that lead to global warming.  Think about the concept of having the buildings and streets of cities treated with photocatalytic cement.  Everyone walking down the street would be less than eight feet from sideways, streets and buildings, so the pollution people would inhale would be dramatically reduced.   We could institutionalize through building codes that all concrete be coated with these materials and that regular reapplications would be mandatory.


 

 Another positive aspect of this discovery is that one of the things that humanity has done that contributes to global warming is  the vast paving of the land in the U.S. and around the world, since all this asphalt and concrete retains heat and prevents water absorption.  We can now take one of our more egregious assaults on the environment and negate it to some degree.  Make all our building materials act like trees!


 

It will take dozens, if not hundreds of such technological breakthroughs and their implementation to make substantial inroads in our effort to slow and ultimately reverse global warming.  We must look at everything we do regarding energy use and consistently find ways to change our behavior and correct damage done.  However, for each breakthrough we must celebrate a small victory.  Three cheers for titanium oxide!


Comments

sciencesque's picture

I'm not a chemist and I don't know how TiO2 is made, but I wonder if there are environmental costs associated with its production. Covering every building with TiO2 would be bad if it sucked up less pollution than was produced in its manufacture

Yes, sciencesque that is always a problem. I don't know the answer but certainly it is nice to have a POSITIVE unintended consequence for a change.

se7en's picture

That's an amazing discovery, it reminds me of the catalytic breakdown of hydrocarbons in automobile exhaust converters, using platinum coated ceramic pellets. And, if I remember correctly, titanium is a very abundant resource, with one of it's principle uses as a non-toxic replacement for lead in ordinary paint products.


 Sometimes, great things happen purely by accident.


Hank's picture
10% of global CO2 emissions are from concrete so it would be welcome news to have less of it no matter where you fall on the science spectrum regarding CO2 impact on global warming.

But as a California guy, I have to echo Tim's caution. When something sounds too good to be true, I see MTBE. We're still paying to clean up the mess from that stuff even though it was touted as the savior for the environment in our gas.

Hank-

I don't necessarily disagree, it could be bad, but I don't think so. In any case, when it comes to global warming and alternative energy, everything should be put on the table for discussion, review and possible implementation.

David

Wow, titanium dioxide. The main ingredient in white paint and a major ingredient in infant sunblock.

It's in paint because it's very white, not because it's a replacement for lead.

In other words, a big YAWN about the material --- it has been used for decades, if not centuries. But a big NEATO that they figured out that this common material has that extraordinary property.

The main drawback is that if you painted sidewalks with it, you would be blinded by the reflection when the sun is high, and you'd have to wear sunglasses and titanium dioxide-bearing sunscreen to protect against UV.

Hank's picture
Interesting. Kinda makes you think a secret cabal of titanium oxide materials manufacturers are behind this study.

Big Tobacco, Big Oil, Big Titanium Dioxide. It doesn't quite have the same ring to it yet.

Monkey Puzzler -

Makes me think of the 80s rock song: "Our Future is so bright we got to wear shades"

If it can only be white paint that is limiting. However, that should give us focus to find ways to get it into other colors.

se7en's picture

Actually, lead was also used in paint to help achieve greater coverage with fewer coats, not just because of the whiteness factor, titanium dioxide also does the same thing as well as adding to the whiteness.


This technology eliminates *nitrogen* oxides, not *carbon* oxides.

That's because, as a catalyst, the pigment doesn't add energy to the reaction: nitrogen oxides are unstable, while carbon dioxide is emitted precisely because it's so stable (i.e., we can release energy by producing it).

There won't be much effect on greenhouse gases one way or the other with this technology.

Hank's picture
I think Joel deserves his own column. What do you all say?

Talk about downsides --- look at this one. Like fish? http://www.ingentaconnect.com/search/article?title=Titanium+dioxide&title_type=tka&year_from=1998&year_to=2007&database=1&pageSize=20&index=4
Hank's picture
It's just an abstract so maybe it's unknown but wouldn't you have to be pouring the stuff into a fish to reach those levels?

Short answer, no, you don't have to dip the fish in TiO2 to show bioaccumulation.

You can look this stuff up.

If you used that link more than a day after I posted it, the search results will differ; try using Google Scholar, set it for a recent date (since say 2005 or 2006) and it will give you a variety of ways to get the information even if the first hit is to a fee/subscription source (web search link for example).

Any reference librarian should also be able to help you with these searches, whether you're using a public or an academic library.

I'm willing to help out if you don't find answers with those methods, but please post what searches you've done if you're looking into this first so I know where to start. There's a good bit of material available, and you'll notice there's serious attention being paid to how to bind materials like TiO2 to surfaces, I'm sure because of concern that it's already being detected bioaccumulating ("sintering" is one such method --- the success or failure will show up in monitoring downstream).

I'm willing to help with homework as my time allows, but may not reply promptly; I'm better able to help with search suggestions and pointers.

Bottom line --- this is wonderfully promising new technology, and checking for externalized costs will be routine (at least outside the USA, where the precautionary principle isn't followed).

so how does it do that then ..has anyone got the equations for a step by step reaction??!!

David Houle's picture

Someone probably does, but I don't have the equation, sorry.


David Houle's picture

Hank-

Great comment!  Collaborate on this research as it is a great technology that should be better utilized, globally!

 

David

 


Note -- I'm not "Hank" here -- I'm not the person whose userid is "Hank" whose name links to this new website. I give my full name where I post.

And I'm not an enthusiast. I see no reason to urge rushing into widespread use of TiO2 yet --- this thread is an example of lack of attention to normal risk analysis.

I'll wait to decide if this is a real science site. I've suggested ways to approach a discussion, if this site's going to address science.

Remember, we fool ourselves more easily than we fool others. Science is, as Feynmann famously pointed out, the way we try to address that problem.

Suggestion: develop the habit of citing your sources and saying why you consider your sources to be reliable. That will help people do their own research and find later news about the subject that may change their opinions (and yours).

Suggestion: disclose any connection you have with the products being discussed or their sponsors.

Last thought: There's far more PR online masquerading as science than there is real science. Ask people's credentials; ask what they've published; ask if they're posting from or for their employers; find out who's a scientist, who's a journalist, who's a blogger, and who's a PR person.

For the sources, check the cites/footnotes -- that can help sort them out.

I happened into this thread because it turned up tangentially in a search I was doing for something else; I'm not a regular reader here. Bonne chance.

Hank's picture
Every author on here has a bio - "Hank" is my login and that's why it shows up on here that way. I'm usually the only 'Hank' so it doesn't create much confusion.

Anyway, it's easy to know who's a scientist and who's a science journalist or anything else. It says in their bio. We do this stuff for free but if the Titanium Dioxide industry wants to open up the spigots because of David's article, I'll set up a Paypal account.

In the TiO2 article in the Related Articles box above they talk about how Titanium Dioxide is helping solve the mysteries of biology. Maybe the guys at NIST are on the take also??

P.S. Thanks for the search tips! As you can tell by article titles like Who funds the chocolate consensus? and Will meat from cloned animals kill you?, if something sounds like hype, one of us will go after it.

Please reconsider your style of response. This sort of comment is discouraging to find from a science site host.

> It's just an abstract so maybe it's unknown but
> wouldn't you have to be pouring the stuff into a
> fish to reach those levels?

> Maybe the guys at NIST are on the take also??

Remember you're writing not just to reply to one comment but for subsequent readers who come later for information.

The first reply is plain wrong; you disparaged the cited toxicology report instead of following up the question raised.

The second -- implying someone, anyone, has been accused of taking a bribe --- is ugly as well as wrong.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.