Track your comments!
[x]
When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!
[#959] Re: What "scientific law" says
Bob Ford | 05/12/07 | 06:56 AM
T. rex ate coconuts (456 replies) 3 May 2007 - 4:25amArgument from the (May 6 2007 - 6:04am) Also, what laws of nature is (May 6 2007 - 6:03am) oh christ, is there someone (May 6 2007 - 6:02am) The existence of laws (May 6 2007 - 6:01am) Believe it or not we are all (May 6 2007 - 5:53am) What "scientific law" says (May 6 2007 - 5:47am) Ever noticed how unevolved (May 6 2007 - 5:34am) Ah creationists, your (May 6 2007 - 5:23am) Burden of proof lies on (May 6 2007 - 5:21am) You can't prove God exists (May 6 2007 - 5:20am) There is no faith in (May 6 2007 - 5:18am) There is at no point in (May 6 2007 - 5:16am) You can't prove God doesn't (May 6 2007 - 5:11am) My first thought was "so why (May 6 2007 - 5:07am) Evolutionists make me laugh.
(May 6 2007 - 4:51am) In the animal kingdom, you (May 6 2007 - 4:51am) How many cocnuts would (May 6 2007 - 4:48am) Creationists make me cry.
(May 6 2007 - 4:47am) So the coconuts killed the (May 6 2007 - 4:46am) "the person HAS to have seen (May 6 2007 - 4:39am) A lot of the animals ate one (May 6 2007 - 4:38am) In the animal kingdom, you (May 6 2007 - 4:33am) Why is teaching evolution (May 6 2007 - 4:33am) I can see God was forward (May 6 2007 - 4:30am) The two people defending (May 6 2007 - 4:30am) @ Nikon:
>Wow, the world's (May 6 2007 - 4:16am) It's funny how this post (May 6 2007 - 4:16am) give me a break! No one is (May 6 2007 - 4:11am) @Dan - Think for yourself (May 6 2007 - 4:08am) the part that always gets me (May 6 2007 - 4:08am) "In Genesis 1:30 God gives (May 6 2007 - 4:08am) Wow, the world's best (May 6 2007 - 3:57am) Science is a creation by (May 6 2007 - 3:56am) Goodness. These people (May 6 2007 - 3:45am) T Rex ate coconuts and then (May 3 2007 - 9:20am)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jun 6 2009 - 4:00am)
- @ ADAM Yes, Adam, I am (Jun 6 2009 - 3:35pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jun 2 2009 - 2:32am)
- @ADAM I'm not sure what you (Jun 5 2009 - 4:21pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jun 1 2009 - 11:44pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 21 2009 - 7:14pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 21 2009 - 6:04pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 20 2009 - 11:10pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 20 2009 - 8:12pm)
- @ ADAM Coconut palms are very (May 20 2009 - 9:13pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 14 2009 - 1:58am)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Feb 1 2009 - 3:36am)
- Re: Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Feb 12 2009 - 4:35pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jan 30 2009 - 8:13pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jan 29 2009 - 12:45pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jan 29 2009 - 12:43pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jan 26 2009 - 8:46am)
- @ Nils Erickson Nils, I would (Jan 27 2009 - 12:27pm)
- @ ANONYMOUS (previous post) I (Nov 24 2008 - 3:32pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Nov 14 2008 - 3:22pm)
- JIM MYRES, That's the sad (Nov 2 2008 - 3:01am)
- Back to the fact that the (Oct 30 2008 - 9:43pm)
- wow.. haha awesome article! (Sep 16 2008 - 6:56pm)
- @AIROVERWATER Dear (Sep 5 2008 - 3:07pm)
- We don't have a Pastafarian (Sep 4 2008 - 9:29am)
- Please, Christopher, "me and (Aug 26 2008 - 8:37pm)
- Oh, ChrisTopher, you (Aug 26 2008 - 2:57am)
- Beer volcano and Stripper (Sep 4 2008 - 9:05am)
- what galax am i from? i (Aug 26 2008 - 6:26pm)
- people choose religion (Aug 25 2008 - 8:21pm)
- That's FENWICK not FEMWICK, (Aug 24 2008 - 8:34pm)
- Want to become a (Aug 24 2008 - 8:25pm)
- As a Pastafarian, I find the (Aug 24 2008 - 3:35pm)
- Oh, and to the anonymous (Aug 24 2008 - 3:04pm)
- Remember, Jesus loves you so (Aug 24 2008 - 2:06pm)
- This artical reminds me of (Jul 16 2008 - 12:20am)
- But I believe in purple (Jul 7 2008 - 4:58pm)
- Interesting how if you post (Jun 18 2008 - 7:43pm)
- Interesting how if you post (Jun 18 2008 - 7:38pm)
- (No subject) (Jun 17 2008 - 11:24am)
- Rafael (06/17/08) My old (Feb 1 2009 - 4:16pm)
- At some point in our (Jun 14 2008 - 4:37pm)
- Darwin himself said that (Jun 14 2008 - 4:23pm)
- Heaven is merely a theory as (Jun 11 2008 - 3:34pm)
- Sure, you have no proof to (May 22 2008 - 12:15am)
- My points here have (Oct 25 2007 - 4:42pm)
- Creationist fools.... If (Oct 25 2007 - 3:45pm)
- "Paging Dr. Cox... Paging (Jul 14 2007 - 10:51am)
- If everyone would honestly (Jun 12 2007 - 3:10pm)
- Please present the "FACTS" - (Oct 25 2007 - 3:54pm)
- Paging Dr. Cox... Paging Dr. (Jul 14 2007 - 8:20am)
- I only have a few things to (Jun 12 2007 - 11:35am)
- "Intelligent design is the (Jun 10 2007 - 8:40pm)
- There has never been any (Jun 8 2007 - 3:13pm)
- Hello, I;m from Australia. (Jun 7 2007 - 6:48pm)
- The falsity of ID is proved (Jun 7 2007 - 2:28pm)
- That took me to a video on (Jun 7 2007 - 1:43pm)
- All sides take a step back. (Jun 7 2007 - 1:36pm)
- I always heard that it (Jun 7 2007 - 10:23am)
- If the Christian God made (Jun 7 2007 - 9:50am)
- Dude looks like a lady (Jun 7 2007 - 9:27am)
- I whole heartedly agree with (Jun 7 2007 - 9:23am)
- I think it is just FINE (Jun 7 2007 - 9:20am)
- http://kscakes.com.nyud.net:8 (Jun 7 2007 - 9:19am)
- I think it is just FINE (Jun 7 2007 - 9:17am)
- What's the gist of the (Jun 7 2007 - 8:49am)
- Not sure it's the "gist" of (Jun 7 2007 - 8:59am)
- I hesitate to get involved (Jun 7 2007 - 8:35am)
- oops, said "they're" and (Jun 7 2007 - 7:47am)
- It's sad, really. Some day, (Jun 7 2007 - 7:40am)
- Guys, give up the debate (Jun 7 2007 - 4:38am)
- You're all wrong, (Jun 7 2007 - 4:09am)
- Unfortunately, there is no (Jun 7 2007 - 2:44am)
- I think someone's been (Jun 7 2007 - 2:41am)
- Honestly... I think the (Jun 6 2007 - 11:18pm)
- Hmmm ... so God really (Jun 6 2007 - 9:57pm)
- Dinosaurs didn't exist. (Jun 6 2007 - 7:55pm)
- "Give a man a fish, and (Jun 11 2008 - 3:47pm)
- ATTENTION, OLD TESTAMENT (Jun 5 2007 - 10:51am)
- It's pretty sickening (Jun 4 2007 - 3:51am)
- Wow... paganism at it's (Jun 3 2007 - 12:07am)
- Well, I have never pushed my (Jun 1 2007 - 12:52pm)
- No. Their problem is that (Jun 1 2007 - 11:11am)
- Would you people please stop (May 26 2007 - 2:44pm)
- Jesus Loves You!
(May 21 2007 - 8:42pm)
- I just hate them damned (Jun 11 2008 - 4:02pm)
- BladeSling, you sound like (May 21 2007 - 3:43pm)
- Holy damn it is annoying (May 21 2007 - 2:30am)
- BladeSling, you wrote: "A (Jun 4 2007 - 9:27am)
- So, BladeSling, you don't (May 21 2007 - 5:50am)
- Walt, We don't know anything (May 21 2007 - 1:06pm)
- Science is based on (May 14 2007 - 2:18pm)
- You are so right, Matt! (May 14 2007 - 7:10pm)
- Can you give a citation or (May 14 2007 - 11:17am)
- True "Science" is able to be (May 14 2007 - 2:16am)
- Michael, I agree. I'm (May 14 2007 - 11:06am)
- I did ask because isnt it (May 13 2007 - 10:14am)
- I wondered about the word (May 13 2007 - 8:56pm)
- for truth about evolution go (May 13 2007 - 3:35am)
- for truth about evolution go (May 13 2007 - 3:34am)
- Can i ask this question to (May 11 2007 - 3:14pm)
- Yes, I do believe that the (May 12 2007 - 6:12am)
- Could Walt, Jon, Steve (May 9 2007 - 11:59pm)
- Answers in Genesis (May 9 2007 - 5:26pm)
- Amazing...you're (May 8 2007 - 2:51pm)
- Science is about (May 8 2007 - 7:56am)
- Here is the reference to the (May 9 2007 - 12:44pm)
- I very much disagree that (May 9 2007 - 12:39pm)
- "Obfuscation is a technique (May 9 2007 - 10:51pm)
- No, John0877, obfuscation is (May 10 2007 - 6:49am)
- Re: No, John0877, obfuscation is (Jun 17 2009 - 6:33pm)
- No, John0877, obfuscation is (May 10 2007 - 6:49am)
- "Obfuscation is a technique (May 9 2007 - 10:51pm)
- Are you freaking kidding me? (May 7 2007 - 7:53pm)
- Wow, what a rant: "Are you (May 9 2007 - 12:15pm)
- Am I the only one finding it (May 7 2007 - 2:56pm)
- Who is fighting science? (May 9 2007 - 11:58am)
- problem is creationists (May 9 2007 - 10:44pm)
- It's not a problem to adjust (May 10 2007 - 10:27pm)
- Wow. We just can't win for (May 9 2007 - 11:33pm)
- Re: Wow. We just can't win for (Feb 20 2009 - 7:25pm)
- problem is creationists (May 9 2007 - 10:44pm)
- Who is fighting science? (May 9 2007 - 11:58am)
- I love being an athiest - (May 7 2007 - 11:07am)
- Hey, Anonymous, thanks for (May 11 2007 - 5:28am)
- I have sent all my servants (May 7 2007 - 11:35am)
- so this "God" commands (May 7 2007 - 1:48pm)
- I hate to break it to you, (May 7 2007 - 11:15pm)
- if he did in fact create (May 8 2007 - 12:10am)
- Muhammad is not the name for (May 8 2007 - 12:26am)
- oops got the whole (May 8 2007 - 12:31am)
- God is almighty and supreme. (May 8 2007 - 1:00am)
- Re: God is almighty and supreme. (Dec 17 2008 - 11:41am)
- Re: Re: God is almighty and supreme. (Feb 19 2009 - 9:44pm)
- "That's the same attitude (Feb 19 2009 - 10:00pm)
- Re: Re: God is almighty and supreme. (Feb 19 2009 - 9:44pm)
- [quote]God is almighty and (May 8 2007 - 3:13am)
- [quote]God is almighty and (May 8 2007 - 3:09am)
- then i say God, bring it.
if (May 8 2007 - 1:22am)
- John0877, what evidence do (May 10 2007 - 4:07pm)
- I don't do it as a (May 8 2007 - 1:25am)
- and these ways "God" has (May 8 2007 - 1:49am)
- Re: God is almighty and supreme. (Dec 17 2008 - 11:41am)
- God is almighty and supreme. (May 8 2007 - 1:00am)
- oops got the whole (May 8 2007 - 12:31am)
- Muhammad is not the name for (May 8 2007 - 12:26am)
- if he did in fact create (May 8 2007 - 12:10am)
- I hate to break it to you, (May 7 2007 - 11:15pm)
- so this "God" commands (May 7 2007 - 1:48pm)
- Yea, I'm not one to pass (May 7 2007 - 8:37am)
- haha im a christian, dont (May 7 2007 - 7:05am)
- the part that gets me is how (May 6 2007 - 10:51pm)
- John, John, John ... Don't (May 11 2007 - 12:50pm)
- That is a valid point. For (May 7 2007 - 1:31am)
- Ohh... I can't believe this (Jun 7 2007 - 3:46am)
- http://answersingenesis.org/m (May 6 2007 - 10:23pm)
- It doesn't have to be (Jun 7 2007 - 1:53am)
- I'm so tired of being (May 6 2007 - 9:57pm)
- You haven't conversed with (May 11 2007 - 11:36am)
- Look, let's just have a (May 6 2007 - 9:55pm)
- scientists don't debate (Jun 7 2007 - 5:41pm)
- scientists don't debate (Jun 7 2007 - 5:39pm)
- Steve, for a number of years (May 25 2007 - 3:18pm)
- I lean more towards (May 6 2007 - 5:46pm)
- I agree with authors (May 6 2007 - 5:38pm)
- Why would God kill these (May 6 2007 - 5:28pm)
- Well, the same reason that (May 9 2007 - 11:52am)
- Just a quick question.
If (May 6 2007 - 4:03pm)
- I venture a guess that dinos (May 9 2007 - 12:03pm)
- Thanks for you attitude, (May 7 2007 - 1:26am)
- If that feasibility study is (May 8 2007 - 2:15am)
- I loved reading these (May 6 2007 - 3:39pm)
- It says in genesis man was (May 6 2007 - 2:28pm)
- where does it say that man (Jun 7 2007 - 2:31pm)
- It's in Genesis, right (Jun 7 2007 - 3:47pm)
- where does it say that man (Jun 7 2007 - 2:31pm)
- Quote: I have faith in a (May 6 2007 - 2:10pm)
- headache... must... do... (May 6 2007 - 1:24pm)
- Quote: Your position is (May 6 2007 - 1:16pm)
- > Natural Selection does not (May 6 2007 - 2:09pm)
- Yes it does, you do not (May 7 2007 - 1:04am)
- Mutations and natural (Jun 10 2007 - 3:19pm)
- Even if you accept the (Jun 7 2007 - 1:09am)
- Yes it does, you do not (May 7 2007 - 1:04am)
- > Natural Selection does not (May 6 2007 - 2:09pm)
- So is that an African or (May 6 2007 - 12:42pm)
- I don't know (Jun 7 2007 - 7:04pm)
- Are you suggesting that (Jun 7 2007 - 6:04am)
- It could grip it by the husk (Jun 7 2007 - 7:46am)
- yes, it is kind of odd that (Jun 6 2007 - 11:00pm)
- God created men,womyn, and (May 6 2007 - 12:31pm)
- Isn’t it odd that the (May 6 2007 - 12:10pm)
- ...and it is just as odd (Jun 7 2007 - 7:20am)
- The universe was created 5 (Jun 6 2007 - 11:02pm)
- The universe looks young to (May 11 2007 - 1:17pm)
- 6000 earth years? (Jun 7 2007 - 8:59am)
- Think about this: God (May 6 2007 - 11:53am)
- Think about this: if you (Jun 7 2007 - 7:45am)
- That's ludicrous. An (Jun 8 2007 - 7:57am)
- Think about this: if you (Jun 7 2007 - 7:45am)
- "Godstones, Meet the (May 6 2007 - 11:36am)
- My one beef with GOD is that (May 6 2007 - 11:23am)
- Because He tells us that he (May 7 2007 - 1:25am)
- "He" didn't tell "us" (Jun 7 2007 - 10:52am)
- Can we please stop assuming (Jun 7 2007 - 12:57pm)
- Just a quick reply. Imago (Jun 13 2007 - 11:36am)
- Can we please stop assuming (Jun 7 2007 - 12:57pm)
- "He" didn't tell "us" (Jun 7 2007 - 10:52am)
- Because He tells us that he (May 7 2007 - 1:25am)
- LOL - Oh the (May 6 2007 - 10:51am)
- bobbb, you write that (May 11 2007 - 1:06pm)
- Indeed, Kepler would be (May 7 2007 - 1:14am)
- for whoever is still arguing (May 6 2007 - 10:46am)
- AiG: Did you know that most (May 7 2007 - 1:06am)
- though I personally believe (May 6 2007 - 10:07am)
- What you have described is (May 6 2007 - 11:02am)
- Creationists enjoy saying (May 6 2007 - 9:48am)
- I said I'd bow out of this (May 6 2007 - 10:10am)
- It's not all random!!!
There (May 6 2007 - 11:16am)
- DNA = deoxyribonucleic (Jun 11 2008 - 4:25pm)
- What you have presented as (May 6 2007 - 10:55am)
- That is a complete (May 7 2007 - 1:25am)
- and the concept of God is (May 6 2007 - 10:49am)
- Argh! The superscript tag (May 6 2007 - 10:14am)
- It's not all random!!!
There (May 6 2007 - 11:16am)
- I said I'd bow out of this (May 6 2007 - 10:10am)
- fighting over opinions on (May 6 2007 - 9:48am)
- Tim, I'm intrigued by your (May 11 2007 - 2:18pm)
- I keep reading these (May 6 2007 - 9:34am)
- coconut trees only date back (May 6 2007 - 9:26am)
- surely debating the options (May 6 2007 - 9:02am)
- Come on. This (May 6 2007 - 8:55am)
- I beg to differ. This isn't (May 11 2007 - 10:17am)
- Because I am convinced with (May 6 2007 - 9:44am)
- Nice of you to bow out after (May 6 2007 - 12:56pm)
- Learn to read timestamps and (May 6 2007 - 10:44pm)
- Nice of you to bow out after (May 6 2007 - 12:56pm)
- "Sound logic and careful (May 6 2007 - 8:41am)
- Yes, the consequences of (May 6 2007 - 8:55am)
- exodus was written a long (May 6 2007 - 9:36am)
- Re: exodus was written a long (Mar 20 2009 - 3:46pm)
- That was the Old Testament (May 6 2007 - 9:32am)
- exodus was written a long (May 6 2007 - 9:36am)
- Yes, the consequences of (May 6 2007 - 8:55am)
- For my sake, stop arguing (May 6 2007 - 8:40am)
- you are a nutter who doesn't (May 6 2007 - 9:50am)
- "yahwey" isn't a name, it's (May 6 2007 - 11:40am)
- you are a nutter who doesn't (May 6 2007 - 9:50am)
- If you want a comical and (May 6 2007 - 8:39am)
- Doug, Doug, Doug! Next (May 11 2007 - 4:15pm)
- In the end, we need to think (May 6 2007 - 8:26am)
- me too, empirical evidence (May 6 2007 - 8:14am)
- from the OED
assume
• (May 6 2007 - 7:51am)
- Ok, then I guess we should (May 6 2007 - 7:55am)
- what is an assumption if not (May 6 2007 - 7:21am)
- There's a big difference. An (May 6 2007 - 7:36am)
- lol i will skull fuck god (May 6 2007 - 7:18am)
- I've got to believe this is (May 6 2007 - 7:08am)
- surely a hypothesis is a (May 6 2007 - 7:05am)
- A Hypothesis consists either (May 6 2007 - 7:10am)
- "The Creation Museum, which (May 6 2007 - 6:56am)
- no one cares (May 8 2007 - 7:39pm)
- Where would Darwin be (May 6 2007 - 6:52am)
- Nonsense. Darwin came up (May 6 2007 - 6:58am)
- Nonsense. Darwin came up (May 6 2007 - 8:54am)
- Yeah, can't see evolution (May 6 2007 - 10:18am)
- Nonsense. Darwin came up (May 6 2007 - 8:54am)
- If your trying to use that (May 6 2007 - 6:57am)
- Nonsense. Darwin came up (May 6 2007 - 6:58am)
- And this kind of faith is (May 6 2007 - 6:48am)
- Yes, because he's shown such (May 6 2007 - 10:12am)
- "Just because science (May 6 2007 - 6:40am)
- If your refering to (May 6 2007 - 6:40am)
- If your refering to (May 6 2007 - 6:39am)
- I'm amazed that the (May 6 2007 - 6:39am)
- There's nothing quite like a (May 6 2007 - 7:14am)
- It seems that you have (May 6 2007 - 1:52pm)
- There's nothing quite like a (May 6 2007 - 7:14am)
- Sorry, but beliefs based on (May 6 2007 - 6:35am)
- Sorry, but beliefs based on (May 6 2007 - 6:31am)
- God delights in diversity. (May 6 2007 - 6:25am)
- Just because science (May 6 2007 - 6:16am)
- The difference between (May 6 2007 - 6:11am)
- What sense evolution makes (May 12 2007 - 7:21am)
- You are right, it is our (May 19 2007 - 11:05pm)
- I think it may be that god (May 6 2007 - 7:17am)
- What sense evolution makes (May 12 2007 - 7:21am)
- At this point the theist is (May 6 2007 - 6:11am)
- Brillant idea! Instead of (May 6 2007 - 8:31am)
- The Entropy4 (May 6 2007 - 6:07am)
- This applies to systems with (May 6 2007 - 6:27am)
- I am speaking of the (May 6 2007 - 6:46am)
- Hey, great! Why not make a (May 12 2007 - 7:04am)
- The observations and (May 12 2007 - 6:56am)
- Yes, and evolutionists, (May 12 2007 - 6:51am)
- heard of thermodynamics?
(May 6 2007 - 10:45am)
- Thermodynamics has nothing (May 6 2007 - 1:28pm)
- Talk Origins in this page, (May 12 2007 - 6:47am)
- Thermodynamics has nothing (May 6 2007 - 1:28pm)
- Cite one.
(May 6 2007 - 9:29am)
- Here are over 29 distinct (May 6 2007 - 1:14pm)
- Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, (May 7 2007 - 5:24am)
- Here are over 29 distinct (May 6 2007 - 1:14pm)
- Just because you cannot (May 6 2007 - 9:05am)
- "You have faith in evolution (May 6 2007 - 8:06am)
- You see the T-rex and the (May 6 2007 - 8:22am)
- One thing worries me about (May 6 2007 - 5:11am)
- Blind faith in a story book (May 6 2007 - 8:08am)
- > ... There's only one (May 6 2007 - 10:52am)
- ... Demonstrably untrue. The (May 7 2007 - 5:09am)
- > I was refuting the (May 8 2007 - 12:32pm)
- And what, pray-tell, was the (May 9 2007 - 11:56pm)
- > I was refuting the (May 8 2007 - 12:32pm)
- > > There must be an (May 6 2007 - 6:38pm)
- > And because we don't (May 8 2007 - 11:48am)
- I love your reply, it says (May 6 2007 - 11:15am)
- ... Demonstrably untrue. The (May 7 2007 - 5:09am)
- According to scientific law, (May 6 2007 - 8:16am)
- Oh, cool. Thanks for (May 6 2007 - 8:04am)
- I read the article that you (May 6 2007 - 6:07am)
- Erm. trillions of molecules (May 6 2007 - 6:23am)
- Have you studied DNA?
So (May 6 2007 - 6:35am)
- I am not an expert, but I (May 6 2007 - 2:26pm)
- Actually I think that may be (May 6 2007 - 11:10am)
- Great, let's solve the (May 6 2007 - 8:35am)
- Why is it so improbable? How (May 6 2007 - 1:29pm)
- Who says something is bein (May 6 2007 - 2:19pm)
- Sounds interesting....kind (May 6 2007 - 2:51pm)
- Who says something is bein (May 6 2007 - 2:19pm)
- have YOU studied dna it (May 6 2007 - 11:37am)
- Yeah, just keep adding years (May 6 2007 - 3:12pm)
- I was holding my tongue, but (May 8 2007 - 5:46pm)
- The new diseases are (May 8 2007 - 8:00pm)
- I was holding my tongue, but (May 8 2007 - 5:46pm)
- Yeah, just keep adding years (May 6 2007 - 3:12pm)
- Why is it so improbable? How (May 6 2007 - 1:29pm)
- Your position is invalid. (May 6 2007 - 6:52am)
- I think this is where you (May 6 2007 - 1:23pm)
- Not only that, but (May 6 2007 - 8:47am)
- Have you studied DNA?
So (May 6 2007 - 6:35am)
- Erm. trillions of molecules (May 6 2007 - 6:23am)
- hmm... I believe "sites" was (Sep 4 2008 - 10:51am)
- Hans, Sometimes spelling (May 6 2007 - 2:17pm)
- yes, I do agree with this. (May 6 2007 - 7:51am)
- Fact: Thee bible is a mixed (May 6 2007 - 5:33am)
- AMEN :) (May 6 2007 - 8:05am)
- You might want to try being (May 6 2007 - 7:58am)
- I have been reading these (May 6 2007 - 11:07am)
- Anonymous, who is cramming (May 11 2007 - 4:29pm)
- Anonymous, who is cramming (May 11 2007 - 4:29pm)
- I thought humility was (May 6 2007 - 10:59am)
- I think you are projecting (May 12 2007 - 12:55pm)
- It's something quite typical (May 6 2007 - 11:30am)
- > Could you tell me than how (May 6 2007 - 10:32am)
- This argument kills me. (May 6 2007 - 9:51am)
- Please. This is a GOD we're (May 6 2007 - 6:16pm)
- I have been reading these (May 6 2007 - 11:07am)
- Ed, the parent post of your (May 6 2007 - 7:46am)
- >Ed, the parent post of your (May 6 2007 - 11:13am)
- That mistake, that you (May 6 2007 - 12:30pm)
- I guess I wasn't clear (May 6 2007 - 1:46pm)
- Typographical errors simply (Sep 4 2008 - 11:32am)
- Infact? I'd say that (May 6 2007 - 1:35pm)
- I guess I wasn't clear (May 6 2007 - 1:46pm)
- That mistake, that you (May 6 2007 - 12:30pm)
- >Ed, the parent post of your (May 6 2007 - 11:13am)
- Fact: Thee bible is a mixed (May 6 2007 - 6:51am)
- Show me the bible is factual
(May 6 2007 - 8:06am)
- Show me it's not.
(May 6 2007 - 8:41am)
- Done... how about man being (May 6 2007 - 9:03am)
- You need to differentiate (May 6 2007 - 10:05am)
- how can a fictional creation (May 6 2007 - 10:54am)
- You need to differentiate (May 6 2007 - 10:05am)
- Done... how about man being (May 6 2007 - 9:03am)
- Show me it's not.
(May 6 2007 - 8:41am)
- Show me the bible is factual
(May 6 2007 - 8:06am)
- science is heavily fortified (May 6 2007 - 10:45am)
- "Science is heavily (May 12 2007 - 12:50pm)
- Can anybody be this (May 6 2007 - 8:26am)
- "Can anybody be this (May 9 2007 - 6:59am)
- "Can anybody be this (May 9 2007 - 6:42am)
- They had sisters too, but (May 6 2007 - 10:29am)
- I grew up studying the (Jun 1 2007 - 11:46am)
- I grew up studying the (Jun 1 2007 - 11:45am)
- Jennifer, Genesis says Cain (May 6 2007 - 5:55pm)
- So incest with your sister (May 6 2007 - 11:26am)
- The reply I always got when (May 6 2007 - 1:59pm)
- "Think for yourself rather (May 6 2007 - 8:03am)
- No John,
Usher dated the (May 6 2007 - 5:47pm)
- Long periods of time, eh? It (May 6 2007 - 6:12pm)
- Garner,
As I recall, the (May 7 2007 - 1:58pm)
- The most absurd thing about (May 7 2007 - 8:09pm)
- Hans,
Please try again. You (May 8 2007 - 11:38am)
- JL, JL, you are playing fast (May 9 2007 - 12:09pm)
- The Hebrew phrase "evening (May 9 2007 - 8:48am)
- Hans,
Please try again. You (May 8 2007 - 11:38am)
- The most absurd thing about (May 7 2007 - 8:09pm)
- Garner,
As I recall, the (May 7 2007 - 1:58pm)
- Long periods of time, eh? It (May 6 2007 - 6:12pm)
- do you also know that a (May 6 2007 - 7:48am)
- There's no "mystery" behind (May 7 2007 - 12:57am)
- Radiocarbon dating only can (May 8 2007 - 1:20am)
- So you just rather believe (May 6 2007 - 8:13am)
- They are all in agreement (May 6 2007 - 6:00pm)
- Re: They are all in agreement (May 17 2009 - 12:07pm)
- @ Marshall Eubanks You are so (May 17 2009 - 10:10pm)
- Re: They are all in agreement (May 17 2009 - 12:07pm)
- it was soft tissue and not (May 6 2007 - 10:39am)
- Ssssh! You're giving the (May 6 2007 - 1:57pm)
- This is a line of "logic" (May 6 2007 - 3:59pm)
- Well, unless you're a really (May 7 2007 - 7:40pm)
- "If this is indicative of a (May 9 2007 - 7:04am)
- "This, BTW, may be the (Jun 1 2007 - 11:39am)
- Yeah, I'm sure that that DNA (May 7 2007 - 9:03pm)
- Who is to say what is (May 7 2007 - 8:11pm)
- "If this is indicative of a (May 9 2007 - 7:04am)
- That's a good point. (May 6 2007 - 5:45pm)
- Kelly Fulks - It isn't a (May 6 2007 - 4:34pm)
- Well, unless you're a really (May 7 2007 - 7:40pm)
- This is a line of "logic" (May 6 2007 - 3:59pm)
- Ssssh! You're giving the (May 6 2007 - 1:57pm)
- They are all in agreement (May 6 2007 - 6:00pm)
- No, they did not find red (May 6 2007 - 8:09am)
- There's no "mystery" behind (May 7 2007 - 12:57am)
- Smart ≠ good speller - (May 8 2007 - 10:29pm)
- Science is not a creation! (Jun 1 2007 - 11:26am)
- Science is not created by (May 6 2007 - 1:53pm)
- Ok, before you get into (May 9 2007 - 12:55pm)
- "Science is not created by (May 9 2007 - 11:41am)
- god is a creation of man, (May 6 2007 - 10:33am)
- Read the Bible before you (May 6 2007 - 5:39pm)
- If Adam and Eve were the (May 8 2007 - 1:14am)
- The Bible says Adam had many (May 8 2007 - 5:24pm)
- Adam and Eve had more than (May 8 2007 - 1:22am)
- If Adam and Eve were the (May 8 2007 - 1:14am)
- Read the Bible before you (May 6 2007 - 5:39pm)
- Science is a creation by (May 6 2007 - 7:19am)
- Science is not a creation of (May 6 2007 - 8:01am)
- Science is not a creation of (May 6 2007 - 1:04pm)
- Science is not a creation of (May 6 2007 - 8:01am)
- I'm sorry but who are you (May 6 2007 - 6:32am)
- With that logic, heaven is (Jun 11 2008 - 3:24pm)
- I honestly do not intend (May 7 2007 - 11:20am)
- I think your confusion (May 9 2007 - 7:44am)
- (No subject) (Jun 17 2008 - 11:18am)
- Here is the thing. You could (May 24 2007 - 10:55pm)
- It seems that you are basing (May 9 2007 - 7:30am)
- how would you go about (May 12 2007 - 9:20am)
- I think your confusion (May 9 2007 - 7:44am)
- Exactly... the Bible (or at (May 6 2007 - 8:55am)
- Part of the Bible MAY be (May 6 2007 - 4:56pm)
- Part of Evolution may be (May 9 2007 - 4:16pm)
- You don't understand it so (Jun 7 2007 - 7:55am)
- "It has been estimated by (Jun 1 2007 - 4:22pm)
- just because you or anyone (May 9 2007 - 5:55pm)
- Sanskrit,
I think you'd have (May 6 2007 - 5:27pm)
- Fascinating idea, (May 9 2007 - 6:29am)
- How do you know no church (May 7 2007 - 2:20pm)
- Anon,
People who don't write (May 7 2007 - 6:40pm)
- SO I guess the writing of (Oct 25 2007 - 3:28pm)
- Anon,
People who don't write (May 7 2007 - 6:40pm)
- Part of Evolution may be (May 9 2007 - 4:16pm)
- why is it that creationists (May 6 2007 - 11:20am)
- totally agree.
i never (May 9 2007 - 6:06pm)
- i have read stories of (May 9 2007 - 8:01pm)
- people in their oblivious (May 9 2007 - 9:41pm)
- Modern thought has perverted (May 9 2007 - 11:57pm)
- "Disagreeing with you and (May 10 2007 - 12:06am)
- In the beginning the Word (May 10 2007 - 12:13am)
- quoting the fairy tale (May 10 2007 - 12:31am)
- This is why I speak to them (May 10 2007 - 1:08am)
- wow! i had no idea that my (May 12 2007 - 9:00am)
- Just want to clarify. When I (May 24 2007 - 5:21am)
- thank you. :) you made my (May 24 2007 - 5:52pm)
- Hey Maggie I just wanna say (May 24 2007 - 3:41am)
- Just want to clarify. When I (May 24 2007 - 5:21am)
- wow! i had no idea that my (May 12 2007 - 9:00am)
- This is why I speak to them (May 10 2007 - 1:08am)
- quoting the fairy tale (May 10 2007 - 12:31am)
- In the beginning the Word (May 10 2007 - 12:13am)
- "Disagreeing with you and (May 10 2007 - 12:06am)
- Modern thought has perverted (May 9 2007 - 11:57pm)
- people in their oblivious (May 9 2007 - 9:41pm)
- i have read stories of (May 9 2007 - 8:01pm)
- totally agree.
i never (May 9 2007 - 6:06pm)
- Part of the Bible MAY be (May 6 2007 - 4:56pm)
- What's worse is that they (Jun 3 2007 - 10:44pm)
- Re: T Rex ate coconuts and then (Apr 22 2009 - 8:54pm)
- Re: T Rex ate coconuts and then (Jan 13 2009 - 8:47pm)
- Re: Re: T Rex ate coconuts and then (Feb 13 2009 - 8:54am)
- I can tell by your (Feb 13 2009 - 6:23pm)
- Re: I can tell by your (Mar 10 2009 - 1:42pm)
- ... and I don't even have a (Mar 10 2009 - 1:55pm)
- Re: I can tell by your (Mar 10 2009 - 1:42pm)
- I can tell by your (Feb 13 2009 - 6:23pm)
- Ahh yes, "the truth". That (Jan 13 2009 - 9:11pm)
- Re: Re: T Rex ate coconuts and then (Feb 13 2009 - 8:54am)
- as a retired high school (May 7 2007 - 2:51am)
- God created men,womyn, and (May 6 2007 - 12:33pm)


