Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

[#959] Re: What "scientific law" says

The observations and measurements which show that this universe had a beginning are the ones used to argue there is a "cause." This same science is used to support the "big bang" family of hypotheses. And since everything that has a beginning has a cause (a basis of the scientific method), there is a "cause" outside of the universe. Defining this "cause" as God is a faith step. After all it's silly to believe that first there was nothing and then it exploded, wouldn't you say?
T. rex ate coconuts By: Fish Feet (456 replies) 3 May 2007 - 4:25am
  • Argument from the By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 6:04am)
  • Also, what laws of nature is By: Hans Mast (May 6 2007 - 6:03am)
  • oh christ, is there someone By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 6:02am)
  • The existence of laws By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 6:01am)
  • Believe it or not we are all By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 5:53am)
  • What "scientific law" says By: Hans Mast (May 6 2007 - 5:47am)
    • The observations and By: Walt (May 12 2007 - 6:56am)
  • Ever noticed how unevolved By: Revelation (May 6 2007 - 5:34am)
  • Ah creationists, your By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 5:23am)
  • Burden of proof lies on By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 5:21am)
  • You can't prove God exists By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 5:20am)
  • There is no faith in By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 5:18am)
  • There is at no point in By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 5:16am)
  • You can't prove God doesn't By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 5:11am)
  • My first thought was "so why By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 5:07am)
  • Evolutionists make me laugh. By: Hans Mast (May 6 2007 - 4:51am)
  • In the animal kingdom, you By: Hans Mast (May 6 2007 - 4:51am)
  • How many cocnuts would By: C3D Stereophotography (May 6 2007 - 4:48am)
  • Creationists make me cry. By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 4:47am)
  • So the coconuts killed the By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 4:46am)
  • "the person HAS to have seen By: Hans Mast (May 6 2007 - 4:39am)
  • A lot of the animals ate one By: Jesus Christ of Nazareth (May 6 2007 - 4:38am)
  • In the animal kingdom, you By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 4:33am)
  • Why is teaching evolution By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 4:33am)
  • I can see God was forward By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 4:30am)
  • The two people defending By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 4:30am)
  • @ Nikon: >Wow, the world's By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 4:16am)
  • It's funny how this post By: Hans Mast (May 6 2007 - 4:16am)
  • give me a break! No one is By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 4:11am)
  • @Dan - Think for yourself By: Nathan (May 6 2007 - 4:08am)
  • the part that always gets me By: John (May 6 2007 - 4:08am)
  • "In Genesis 1:30 God gives By: Ed (May 6 2007 - 4:08am)
  • Wow, the world's best By: Nikon (May 6 2007 - 3:57am)
  • Science is a creation by By: Anonymous (May 6 2007 - 3:56am)
  • Goodness. These people By: Dan (May 6 2007 - 3:45am)
  • T Rex ate coconuts and then By: Cash (May 3 2007 - 9:20am)