Track your comments!
[x]
When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!
What "scientific law" says
T. rex ate coconuts (456 replies) 3 May 2007 - 4:25amArgument from the (May 6 2007 - 6:04am) Also, what laws of nature is (May 6 2007 - 6:03am) oh christ, is there someone (May 6 2007 - 6:02am) The existence of laws (May 6 2007 - 6:01am) Believe it or not we are all (May 6 2007 - 5:53am) What "scientific law" says (May 6 2007 - 5:47am) Ever noticed how unevolved (May 6 2007 - 5:34am) Ah creationists, your (May 6 2007 - 5:23am) Burden of proof lies on (May 6 2007 - 5:21am) You can't prove God exists (May 6 2007 - 5:20am) There is no faith in (May 6 2007 - 5:18am) There is at no point in (May 6 2007 - 5:16am) You can't prove God doesn't (May 6 2007 - 5:11am) My first thought was "so why (May 6 2007 - 5:07am) Evolutionists make me laugh.
(May 6 2007 - 4:51am) In the animal kingdom, you (May 6 2007 - 4:51am) How many cocnuts would (May 6 2007 - 4:48am) Creationists make me cry.
(May 6 2007 - 4:47am) So the coconuts killed the (May 6 2007 - 4:46am) "the person HAS to have seen (May 6 2007 - 4:39am) A lot of the animals ate one (May 6 2007 - 4:38am) In the animal kingdom, you (May 6 2007 - 4:33am) Why is teaching evolution (May 6 2007 - 4:33am) I can see God was forward (May 6 2007 - 4:30am) The two people defending (May 6 2007 - 4:30am) @ Nikon:
>Wow, the world's (May 6 2007 - 4:16am) It's funny how this post (May 6 2007 - 4:16am) give me a break! No one is (May 6 2007 - 4:11am) @Dan - Think for yourself (May 6 2007 - 4:08am) the part that always gets me (May 6 2007 - 4:08am) "In Genesis 1:30 God gives (May 6 2007 - 4:08am) Wow, the world's best (May 6 2007 - 3:57am) Science is a creation by (May 6 2007 - 3:56am) Goodness. These people (May 6 2007 - 3:45am) T Rex ate coconuts and then (May 3 2007 - 9:20am)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jun 6 2009 - 4:00am)
- @ ADAM Yes, Adam, I am (Jun 6 2009 - 3:35pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jun 2 2009 - 2:32am)
- @ADAM I'm not sure what you (Jun 5 2009 - 4:21pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jun 1 2009 - 11:44pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 21 2009 - 7:14pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 21 2009 - 6:04pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 20 2009 - 11:10pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 20 2009 - 8:12pm)
- @ ADAM Coconut palms are very (May 20 2009 - 9:13pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (May 14 2009 - 1:58am)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Feb 1 2009 - 3:36am)
- Re: Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Feb 12 2009 - 4:35pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jan 30 2009 - 8:13pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jan 29 2009 - 12:45pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jan 29 2009 - 12:43pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Jan 26 2009 - 8:46am)
- @ Nils Erickson Nils, I would (Jan 27 2009 - 12:27pm)
- @ ANONYMOUS (previous post) I (Nov 24 2008 - 3:32pm)
- Re: T. rex ate coconuts (Nov 14 2008 - 3:22pm)
- JIM MYRES, That's the sad (Nov 2 2008 - 3:01am)
- Back to the fact that the (Oct 30 2008 - 9:43pm)
- wow.. haha awesome article! (Sep 16 2008 - 6:56pm)
- @AIROVERWATER Dear (Sep 5 2008 - 3:07pm)
- We don't have a Pastafarian (Sep 4 2008 - 9:29am)
- Please, Christopher, "me and (Aug 26 2008 - 8:37pm)
- Oh, ChrisTopher, you (Aug 26 2008 - 2:57am)
- Beer volcano and Stripper (Sep 4 2008 - 9:05am)
- what galax am i from? i (Aug 26 2008 - 6:26pm)
- people choose religion (Aug 25 2008 - 8:21pm)
- That's FENWICK not FEMWICK, (Aug 24 2008 - 8:34pm)
- Want to become a (Aug 24 2008 - 8:25pm)
- As a Pastafarian, I find the (Aug 24 2008 - 3:35pm)
- Oh, and to the anonymous (Aug 24 2008 - 3:04pm)
- Remember, Jesus loves you so (Aug 24 2008 - 2:06pm)
- This artical reminds me of (Jul 16 2008 - 12:20am)
- But I believe in purple (Jul 7 2008 - 4:58pm)
- Interesting how if you post (Jun 18 2008 - 7:43pm)
- Interesting how if you post (Jun 18 2008 - 7:38pm)
- (No subject) (Jun 17 2008 - 11:24am)
- Rafael (06/17/08) My old (Feb 1 2009 - 4:16pm)
- At some point in our (Jun 14 2008 - 4:37pm)
- Darwin himself said that (Jun 14 2008 - 4:23pm)
- Heaven is merely a theory as (Jun 11 2008 - 3:34pm)
- Sure, you have no proof to (May 22 2008 - 12:15am)
- My points here have (Oct 25 2007 - 4:42pm)
- Creationist fools.... If (Oct 25 2007 - 3:45pm)
- "Paging Dr. Cox... Paging (Jul 14 2007 - 10:51am)
- If everyone would honestly (Jun 12 2007 - 3:10pm)
- Please present the "FACTS" - (Oct 25 2007 - 3:54pm)
- Paging Dr. Cox... Paging Dr. (Jul 14 2007 - 8:20am)
- I only have a few things to (Jun 12 2007 - 11:35am)
- "Intelligent design is the (Jun 10 2007 - 8:40pm)
- There has never been any (Jun 8 2007 - 3:13pm)
- Hello, I;m from Australia. (Jun 7 2007 - 6:48pm)
- The falsity of ID is proved (Jun 7 2007 - 2:28pm)
- That took me to a video on (Jun 7 2007 - 1:43pm)
- All sides take a step back. (Jun 7 2007 - 1:36pm)
- I always heard that it (Jun 7 2007 - 10:23am)
- If the Christian God made (Jun 7 2007 - 9:50am)
- Dude looks like a lady (Jun 7 2007 - 9:27am)
- I whole heartedly agree with (Jun 7 2007 - 9:23am)
- I think it is just FINE (Jun 7 2007 - 9:20am)
- http://kscakes.com.nyud.net:8 (Jun 7 2007 - 9:19am)
- I think it is just FINE (Jun 7 2007 - 9:17am)
- What's the gist of the (Jun 7 2007 - 8:49am)
- Not sure it's the "gist" of (Jun 7 2007 - 8:59am)
- I hesitate to get involved (Jun 7 2007 - 8:35am)
- oops, said "they're" and (Jun 7 2007 - 7:47am)
- It's sad, really. Some day, (Jun 7 2007 - 7:40am)
- Guys, give up the debate (Jun 7 2007 - 4:38am)
- You're all wrong, (Jun 7 2007 - 4:09am)
- Unfortunately, there is no (Jun 7 2007 - 2:44am)
- I think someone's been (Jun 7 2007 - 2:41am)
- Honestly... I think the (Jun 6 2007 - 11:18pm)
- Hmmm ... so God really (Jun 6 2007 - 9:57pm)
- Dinosaurs didn't exist. (Jun 6 2007 - 7:55pm)
- "Give a man a fish, and (Jun 11 2008 - 3:47pm)
- ATTENTION, OLD TESTAMENT (Jun 5 2007 - 10:51am)
- It's pretty sickening (Jun 4 2007 - 3:51am)
- Wow... paganism at it's (Jun 3 2007 - 12:07am)
- Well, I have never pushed my (Jun 1 2007 - 12:52pm)
- No. Their problem is that (Jun 1 2007 - 11:11am)
- Would you people please stop (May 26 2007 - 2:44pm)
- Jesus Loves You!
(May 21 2007 - 8:42pm)
- I just hate them damned (Jun 11 2008 - 4:02pm)
- BladeSling, you sound like (May 21 2007 - 3:43pm)
- Holy damn it is annoying (May 21 2007 - 2:30am)
- BladeSling, you wrote: "A (Jun 4 2007 - 9:27am)
- So, BladeSling, you don't (May 21 2007 - 5:50am)
- Walt, We don't know anything (May 21 2007 - 1:06pm)
- Science is based on (May 14 2007 - 2:18pm)
- You are so right, Matt! (May 14 2007 - 7:10pm)
- Can you give a citation or (May 14 2007 - 11:17am)
- True "Science" is able to be (May 14 2007 - 2:16am)
- Michael, I agree. I'm (May 14 2007 - 11:06am)
- I did ask because isnt it (May 13 2007 - 10:14am)
- I wondered about the word (May 13 2007 - 8:56pm)
- for truth about evolution go (May 13 2007 - 3:35am)
- for truth about evolution go (May 13 2007 - 3:34am)
- Can i ask this question to (May 11 2007 - 3:14pm)
- Yes, I do believe that the (May 12 2007 - 6:12am)
- Could Walt, Jon, Steve (May 9 2007 - 11:59pm)
- Answers in Genesis (May 9 2007 - 5:26pm)
- Amazing...you're (May 8 2007 - 2:51pm)
- Science is about (May 8 2007 - 7:56am)
- Here is the reference to the (May 9 2007 - 12:44pm)
- I very much disagree that (May 9 2007 - 12:39pm)
- "Obfuscation is a technique (May 9 2007 - 10:51pm)
- No, John0877, obfuscation is (May 10 2007 - 6:49am)
- Re: No, John0877, obfuscation is (Jun 17 2009 - 6:33pm)
- No, John0877, obfuscation is (May 10 2007 - 6:49am)
- "Obfuscation is a technique (May 9 2007 - 10:51pm)
- Are you freaking kidding me? (May 7 2007 - 7:53pm)
- Wow, what a rant: "Are you (May 9 2007 - 12:15pm)
- Am I the only one finding it (May 7 2007 - 2:56pm)
- Who is fighting science? (May 9 2007 - 11:58am)
- problem is creationists (May 9 2007 - 10:44pm)
- It's not a problem to adjust (May 10 2007 - 10:27pm)
- Wow. We just can't win for (May 9 2007 - 11:33pm)
- Re: Wow. We just can't win for (Feb 20 2009 - 7:25pm)
- problem is creationists (May 9 2007 - 10:44pm)
- Who is fighting science? (May 9 2007 - 11:58am)
- I love being an athiest - (May 7 2007 - 11:07am)
- Hey, Anonymous, thanks for (May 11 2007 - 5:28am)
- I have sent all my servants (May 7 2007 - 11:35am)
- so this "God" commands (May 7 2007 - 1:48pm)
- I hate to break it to you, (May 7 2007 - 11:15pm)
- if he did in fact create (May 8 2007 - 12:10am)
- Muhammad is not the name for (May 8 2007 - 12:26am)
- oops got the whole (May 8 2007 - 12:31am)
- God is almighty and supreme. (May 8 2007 - 1:00am)
- Re: God is almighty and supreme. (Dec 17 2008 - 11:41am)
- Re: Re: God is almighty and supreme. (Feb 19 2009 - 9:44pm)
- "That's the same attitude (Feb 19 2009 - 10:00pm)
- Re: Re: God is almighty and supreme. (Feb 19 2009 - 9:44pm)
- [quote]God is almighty and (May 8 2007 - 3:13am)
- [quote]God is almighty and (May 8 2007 - 3:09am)
- then i say God, bring it.
if (May 8 2007 - 1:22am)
- John0877, what evidence do (May 10 2007 - 4:07pm)
- I don't do it as a (May 8 2007 - 1:25am)
- and these ways "God" has (May 8 2007 - 1:49am)
- Re: God is almighty and supreme. (Dec 17 2008 - 11:41am)
- God is almighty and supreme. (May 8 2007 - 1:00am)
- oops got the whole (May 8 2007 - 12:31am)
- Muhammad is not the name for (May 8 2007 - 12:26am)
- if he did in fact create (May 8 2007 - 12:10am)
- I hate to break it to you, (May 7 2007 - 11:15pm)
- so this "God" commands (May 7 2007 - 1:48pm)
- Yea, I'm not one to pass (May 7 2007 - 8:37am)
- haha im a christian, dont (May 7 2007 - 7:05am)
- the part that gets me is how (May 6 2007 - 10:51pm)
- John, John, John ... Don't (May 11 2007 - 12:50pm)
- That is a valid point. For (May 7 2007 - 1:31am)
- Ohh... I can't believe this (Jun 7 2007 - 3:46am)
- http://answersingenesis.org/m (May 6 2007 - 10:23pm)
- It doesn't have to be (Jun 7 2007 - 1:53am)
- I'm so tired of being (May 6 2007 - 9:57pm)
- You haven't conversed with (May 11 2007 - 11:36am)
- Look, let's just have a (May 6 2007 - 9:55pm)
- scientists don't debate (Jun 7 2007 - 5:41pm)
- scientists don't debate (Jun 7 2007 - 5:39pm)
- Steve, for a number of years (May 25 2007 - 3:18pm)
- I lean more towards (May 6 2007 - 5:46pm)
- I agree with authors (May 6 2007 - 5:38pm)
- Why would God kill these (May 6 2007 - 5:28pm)
- Well, the same reason that (May 9 2007 - 11:52am)
- Just a quick question.
If (May 6 2007 - 4:03pm)
- I venture a guess that dinos (May 9 2007 - 12:03pm)
- Thanks for you attitude, (May 7 2007 - 1:26am)
- If that feasibility study is (May 8 2007 - 2:15am)
- I loved reading these (May 6 2007 - 3:39pm)
- It says in genesis man was (May 6 2007 - 2:28pm)
- where does it say that man (Jun 7 2007 - 2:31pm)
- It's in Genesis, right (Jun 7 2007 - 3:47pm)
- where does it say that man (Jun 7 2007 - 2:31pm)
- Quote: I have faith in a (May 6 2007 - 2:10pm)
- headache... must... do... (May 6 2007 - 1:24pm)
- Quote: Your position is (May 6 2007 - 1:16pm)
- > Natural Selection does not (May 6 2007 - 2:09pm)
- Yes it does, you do not (May 7 2007 - 1:04am)
- Mutations and natural (Jun 10 2007 - 3:19pm)
- Even if you accept the (Jun 7 2007 - 1:09am)
- Yes it does, you do not (May 7 2007 - 1:04am)
- > Natural Selection does not (May 6 2007 - 2:09pm)
- So is that an African or (May 6 2007 - 12:42pm)
- I don't know (Jun 7 2007 - 7:04pm)
- Are you suggesting that (Jun 7 2007 - 6:04am)
- It could grip it by the husk (Jun 7 2007 - 7:46am)
- yes, it is kind of odd that (Jun 6 2007 - 11:00pm)
- God created men,womyn, and (May 6 2007 - 12:31pm)
- Isn’t it odd that the (May 6 2007 - 12:10pm)
- ...and it is just as odd (Jun 7 2007 - 7:20am)
- The universe was created 5 (Jun 6 2007 - 11:02pm)
- The universe looks young to (May 11 2007 - 1:17pm)
- 6000 earth years? (Jun 7 2007 - 8:59am)
- Think about this: God (May 6 2007 - 11:53am)
- Think about this: if you (Jun 7 2007 - 7:45am)
- That's ludicrous. An (Jun 8 2007 - 7:57am)
- Think about this: if you (Jun 7 2007 - 7:45am)
- "Godstones, Meet the (May 6 2007 - 11:36am)
- My one beef with GOD is that (May 6 2007 - 11:23am)
- Because He tells us that he (May 7 2007 - 1:25am)
- "He" didn't tell "us" (Jun 7 2007 - 10:52am)
- Can we please stop assuming (Jun 7 2007 - 12:57pm)
- Just a quick reply. Imago (Jun 13 2007 - 11:36am)
- Can we please stop assuming (Jun 7 2007 - 12:57pm)
- "He" didn't tell "us" (Jun 7 2007 - 10:52am)
- Because He tells us that he (May 7 2007 - 1:25am)
- LOL - Oh the (May 6 2007 - 10:51am)
- bobbb, you write that (May 11 2007 - 1:06pm)
- Indeed, Kepler would be (May 7 2007 - 1:14am)
- for whoever is still arguing (May 6 2007 - 10:46am)
- AiG: Did you know that most (May 7 2007 - 1:06am)
- though I personally believe (May 6 2007 - 10:07am)
- What you have described is (May 6 2007 - 11:02am)
- Creationists enjoy saying (May 6 2007 - 9:48am)
- I said I'd bow out of this (May 6 2007 - 10:10am)
- It's not all random!!!
There (May 6 2007 - 11:16am)
- DNA = deoxyribonucleic (Jun 11 2008 - 4:25pm)
- What you have presented as (May 6 2007 - 10:55am)
- That is a complete (May 7 2007 - 1:25am)
- and the concept of God is (May 6 2007 - 10:49am)
- Argh! The superscript tag (May 6 2007 - 10:14am)
- It's not all random!!!
There (May 6 2007 - 11:16am)
- I said I'd bow out of this (May 6 2007 - 10:10am)
- fighting over opinions on (May 6 2007 - 9:48am)
- Tim, I'm intrigued by your (May 11 2007 - 2:18pm)
- I keep reading these (May 6 2007 - 9:34am)
- coconut trees only date back (May 6 2007 - 9:26am)
- surely debating the options (May 6 2007 - 9:02am)
- Come on. This (May 6 2007 - 8:55am)
- I beg to differ. This isn't (May 11 2007 - 10:17am)
- Because I am convinced with (May 6 2007 - 9:44am)
- Nice of you to bow out after (May 6 2007 - 12:56pm)
- Learn to read timestamps and (May 6 2007 - 10:44pm)
- Nice of you to bow out after (May 6 2007 - 12:56pm)
- "Sound logic and careful (May 6 2007 - 8:41am)
- Yes, the consequences of (May 6 2007 - 8:55am)
- exodus was written a long (May 6 2007 - 9:36am)
- Re: exodus was written a long (Mar 20 2009 - 3:46pm)
- That was the Old Testament (May 6 2007 - 9:32am)
- exodus was written a long (May 6 2007 - 9:36am)
- Yes, the consequences of (May 6 2007 - 8:55am)
- For my sake, stop arguing (May 6 2007 - 8:40am)
- you are a nutter who doesn't (May 6 2007 - 9:50am)
- "yahwey" isn't a name, it's (May 6 2007 - 11:40am)
- you are a nutter who doesn't (May 6 2007 - 9:50am)
- If you want a comical and (May 6 2007 - 8:39am)
- Doug, Doug, Doug! Next (May 11 2007 - 4:15pm)
- In the end, we need to think (May 6 2007 - 8:26am)
- me too, empirical evidence (May 6 2007 - 8:14am)
- from the OED
assume
• (May 6 2007 - 7:51am)
- Ok, then I guess we should (May 6 2007 - 7:55am)
- what is an assumption if not (May 6 2007 - 7:21am)
- There's a big difference. An (May 6 2007 - 7:36am)
- lol i will skull fuck god (May 6 2007 - 7:18am)
- I've got to believe this is (May 6 2007 - 7:08am)
- surely a hypothesis is a (May 6 2007 - 7:05am)
- A Hypothesis consists either (May 6 2007 - 7:10am)
- "The Creation Museum, which (May 6 2007 - 6:56am)
- no one cares (May 8 2007 - 7:39pm)
- Where would Darwin be (May 6 2007 - 6:52am)
- Nonsense. Darwin came up (May 6 2007 - 6:58am)
- Nonsense. Darwin came up (May 6 2007 - 8:54am)
- Yeah, can't see evolution (May 6 2007 - 10:18am)
- Nonsense. Darwin came up (May 6 2007 - 8:54am)
- If your trying to use that (May 6 2007 - 6:57am)
- Nonsense. Darwin came up (May 6 2007 - 6:58am)
- And this kind of faith is (May 6 2007 - 6:48am)
- Yes, because he's shown such (May 6 2007 - 10:12am)
- "Just because science (May 6 2007 - 6:40am)
- If your refering to (May 6 2007 - 6:40am)
- If your refering to (May 6 2007 - 6:39am)
- I'm amazed that the (May 6 2007 - 6:39am)
- There's nothing quite like a (May 6 2007 - 7:14am)
- It seems that you have (May 6 2007 - 1:52pm)
- There's nothing quite like a (May 6 2007 - 7:14am)
- Sorry, but beliefs based on (May 6 2007 - 6:35am)
- Sorry, but beliefs based on (May 6 2007 - 6:31am)
- God delights in diversity. (May 6 2007 - 6:25am)
- Just because science (May 6 2007 - 6:16am)
- The difference between (May 6 2007 - 6:11am)
- What sense evolution makes (May 12 2007 - 7:21am)
- You are right, it is our (May 19 2007 - 11:05pm)
- I think it may be that god (May 6 2007 - 7:17am)
- What sense evolution makes (May 12 2007 - 7:21am)
- At this point the theist is (May 6 2007 - 6:11am)
- Brillant idea! Instead of (May 6 2007 - 8:31am)
- The Entropy4 (May 6 2007 - 6:07am)
- This applies to systems with (May 6 2007 - 6:27am)
- I am speaking of the (May 6 2007 - 6:46am)
- Hey, great! Why not make a (May 12 2007 - 7:04am)
- The observations and (May 12 2007 - 6:56am)
- Yes, and evolutionists, (May 12 2007 - 6:51am)
- heard of thermodynamics?
(May 6 2007 - 10:45am)
- Thermodynamics has nothing (May 6 2007 - 1:28pm)
- Talk Origins in this page, (May 12 2007 - 6:47am)
- Thermodynamics has nothing (May 6 2007 - 1:28pm)
- Cite one.
(May 6 2007 - 9:29am)
- Here are over 29 distinct (May 6 2007 - 1:14pm)
- Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, (May 7 2007 - 5:24am)
- Here are over 29 distinct (May 6 2007 - 1:14pm)
- Just because you cannot (May 6 2007 - 9:05am)
- "You have faith in evolution (May 6 2007 - 8:06am)
- You see the T-rex and the (May 6 2007 - 8:22am)
- One thing worries me about (May 6 2007 - 5:11am)
- Blind faith in a story book (May 6 2007 - 8:08am)
- > ... There's only one (May 6 2007 - 10:52am)
- ... Demonstrably untrue. The (May 7 2007 - 5:09am)
- > I was refuting the (May 8 2007 - 12:32pm)
- And what, pray-tell, was the (May 9 2007 - 11:56pm)
- > I was refuting the (May 8 2007 - 12:32pm)
- > > There must be an (May 6 2007 - 6:38pm)
- > And because we don't (May 8 2007 - 11:48am)
- I love your reply, it says (May 6 2007 - 11:15am)
- ... Demonstrably untrue. The (May 7 2007 - 5:09am)
- According to scientific law, (May 6 2007 - 8:16am)
- Oh, cool. Thanks for (May 6 2007 - 8:04am)
- I read the article that you (May 6 2007 - 6:07am)
- Erm. trillions of molecules (May 6 2007 - 6:23am)
- Have you studied DNA?
So (May 6 2007 - 6:35am)
- I am not an expert, but I (May 6 2007 - 2:26pm)
- Actually I think that may be (May 6 2007 - 11:10am)
- Great, let's solve the (May 6 2007 - 8:35am)
- Why is it so improbable? How (May 6 2007 - 1:29pm)
- Who says something is bein (May 6 2007 - 2:19pm)
- Sounds interesting....kind (May 6 2007 - 2:51pm)
- Who says something is bein (May 6 2007 - 2:19pm)
- have YOU studied dna it (May 6 2007 - 11:37am)
- Yeah, just keep adding years (May 6 2007 - 3:12pm)
- I was holding my tongue, but (May 8 2007 - 5:46pm)
- The new diseases are (May 8 2007 - 8:00pm)
- I was holding my tongue, but (May 8 2007 - 5:46pm)
- Yeah, just keep adding years (May 6 2007 - 3:12pm)
- Why is it so improbable? How (May 6 2007 - 1:29pm)
- Your position is invalid. (May 6 2007 - 6:52am)
- I think this is where you (May 6 2007 - 1:23pm)
- Not only that, but (May 6 2007 - 8:47am)
- Have you studied DNA?
So (May 6 2007 - 6:35am)
- Erm. trillions of molecules (May 6 2007 - 6:23am)
- hmm... I believe "sites" was (Sep 4 2008 - 10:51am)
- Hans, Sometimes spelling (May 6 2007 - 2:17pm)
- yes, I do agree with this. (May 6 2007 - 7:51am)
- Fact: Thee bible is a mixed (May 6 2007 - 5:33am)
- AMEN :) (May 6 2007 - 8:05am)
- You might want to try being (May 6 2007 - 7:58am)
- I have been reading these (May 6 2007 - 11:07am)
- Anonymous, who is cramming (May 11 2007 - 4:29pm)
- Anonymous, who is cramming (May 11 2007 - 4:29pm)
- I thought humility was (May 6 2007 - 10:59am)
- I think you are projecting (May 12 2007 - 12:55pm)
- It's something quite typical (May 6 2007 - 11:30am)
- > Could you tell me than how (May 6 2007 - 10:32am)
- This argument kills me. (May 6 2007 - 9:51am)
- Please. This is a GOD we're (May 6 2007 - 6:16pm)
- I have been reading these (May 6 2007 - 11:07am)
- Ed, the parent post of your (May 6 2007 - 7:46am)
- >Ed, the parent post of your (May 6 2007 - 11:13am)
- That mistake, that you (May 6 2007 - 12:30pm)
- I guess I wasn't clear (May 6 2007 - 1:46pm)
- Typographical errors simply (Sep 4 2008 - 11:32am)
- Infact? I'd say that (May 6 2007 - 1:35pm)
- I guess I wasn't clear (May 6 2007 - 1:46pm)
- That mistake, that you (May 6 2007 - 12:30pm)
- >Ed, the parent post of your (May 6 2007 - 11:13am)
- Fact: Thee bible is a mixed (May 6 2007 - 6:51am)
- Show me the bible is factual
(May 6 2007 - 8:06am)
- Show me it's not.
(May 6 2007 - 8:41am)
- Done... how about man being (May 6 2007 - 9:03am)
- You need to differentiate (May 6 2007 - 10:05am)
- how can a fictional creation (May 6 2007 - 10:54am)
- You need to differentiate (May 6 2007 - 10:05am)
- Done... how about man being (May 6 2007 - 9:03am)
- Show me it's not.
(May 6 2007 - 8:41am)
- Show me the bible is factual
(May 6 2007 - 8:06am)
- science is heavily fortified (May 6 2007 - 10:45am)
- "Science is heavily (May 12 2007 - 12:50pm)
- Can anybody be this (May 6 2007 - 8:26am)
- "Can anybody be this (May 9 2007 - 6:59am)
- "Can anybody be this (May 9 2007 - 6:42am)
- They had sisters too, but (May 6 2007 - 10:29am)
- I grew up studying the (Jun 1 2007 - 11:46am)
- I grew up studying the (Jun 1 2007 - 11:45am)
- Jennifer, Genesis says Cain (May 6 2007 - 5:55pm)
- So incest with your sister (May 6 2007 - 11:26am)
- The reply I always got when (May 6 2007 - 1:59pm)
- "Think for yourself rather (May 6 2007 - 8:03am)
- No John,
Usher dated the (May 6 2007 - 5:47pm)
- Long periods of time, eh? It (May 6 2007 - 6:12pm)
- Garner,
As I recall, the (May 7 2007 - 1:58pm)
- The most absurd thing about (May 7 2007 - 8:09pm)
- Hans,
Please try again. You (May 8 2007 - 11:38am)
- JL, JL, you are playing fast (May 9 2007 - 12:09pm)
- The Hebrew phrase "evening (May 9 2007 - 8:48am)
- Hans,
Please try again. You (May 8 2007 - 11:38am)
- The most absurd thing about (May 7 2007 - 8:09pm)
- Garner,
As I recall, the (May 7 2007 - 1:58pm)
- Long periods of time, eh? It (May 6 2007 - 6:12pm)
- do you also know that a (May 6 2007 - 7:48am)
- There's no "mystery" behind (May 7 2007 - 12:57am)
- Radiocarbon dating only can (May 8 2007 - 1:20am)
- So you just rather believe (May 6 2007 - 8:13am)
- They are all in agreement (May 6 2007 - 6:00pm)
- Re: They are all in agreement (May 17 2009 - 12:07pm)
- @ Marshall Eubanks You are so (May 17 2009 - 10:10pm)
- Re: They are all in agreement (May 17 2009 - 12:07pm)
- it was soft tissue and not (May 6 2007 - 10:39am)
- Ssssh! You're giving the (May 6 2007 - 1:57pm)
- This is a line of "logic" (May 6 2007 - 3:59pm)
- Well, unless you're a really (May 7 2007 - 7:40pm)
- "If this is indicative of a (May 9 2007 - 7:04am)
- "This, BTW, may be the (Jun 1 2007 - 11:39am)
- Yeah, I'm sure that that DNA (May 7 2007 - 9:03pm)
- Who is to say what is (May 7 2007 - 8:11pm)
- "If this is indicative of a (May 9 2007 - 7:04am)
- That's a good point. (May 6 2007 - 5:45pm)
- Kelly Fulks - It isn't a (May 6 2007 - 4:34pm)
- Well, unless you're a really (May 7 2007 - 7:40pm)
- This is a line of "logic" (May 6 2007 - 3:59pm)
- Ssssh! You're giving the (May 6 2007 - 1:57pm)
- They are all in agreement (May 6 2007 - 6:00pm)
- No, they did not find red (May 6 2007 - 8:09am)
- There's no "mystery" behind (May 7 2007 - 12:57am)
- Smart ≠ good speller - (May 8 2007 - 10:29pm)
- Science is not a creation! (Jun 1 2007 - 11:26am)
- Science is not created by (May 6 2007 - 1:53pm)
- Ok, before you get into (May 9 2007 - 12:55pm)
- "Science is not created by (May 9 2007 - 11:41am)
- god is a creation of man, (May 6 2007 - 10:33am)
- Read the Bible before you (May 6 2007 - 5:39pm)
- If Adam and Eve were the (May 8 2007 - 1:14am)
- The Bible says Adam had many (May 8 2007 - 5:24pm)
- Adam and Eve had more than (May 8 2007 - 1:22am)
- If Adam and Eve were the (May 8 2007 - 1:14am)
- Read the Bible before you (May 6 2007 - 5:39pm)
- Science is a creation by (May 6 2007 - 7:19am)
- Science is not a creation of (May 6 2007 - 8:01am)
- Science is not a creation of (May 6 2007 - 1:04pm)
- Science is not a creation of (May 6 2007 - 8:01am)
- I'm sorry but who are you (May 6 2007 - 6:32am)
- With that logic, heaven is (Jun 11 2008 - 3:24pm)
- I honestly do not intend (May 7 2007 - 11:20am)
- I think your confusion (May 9 2007 - 7:44am)
- (No subject) (Jun 17 2008 - 11:18am)
- Here is the thing. You could (May 24 2007 - 10:55pm)
- It seems that you are basing (May 9 2007 - 7:30am)
- how would you go about (May 12 2007 - 9:20am)
- I think your confusion (May 9 2007 - 7:44am)
- Exactly... the Bible (or at (May 6 2007 - 8:55am)
- Part of the Bible MAY be (May 6 2007 - 4:56pm)
- Part of Evolution may be (May 9 2007 - 4:16pm)
- You don't understand it so (Jun 7 2007 - 7:55am)
- "It has been estimated by (Jun 1 2007 - 4:22pm)
- just because you or anyone (May 9 2007 - 5:55pm)
- Sanskrit,
I think you'd have (May 6 2007 - 5:27pm)
- Fascinating idea, (May 9 2007 - 6:29am)
- How do you know no church (May 7 2007 - 2:20pm)
- Anon,
People who don't write (May 7 2007 - 6:40pm)
- SO I guess the writing of (Oct 25 2007 - 3:28pm)
- Anon,
People who don't write (May 7 2007 - 6:40pm)
- Part of Evolution may be (May 9 2007 - 4:16pm)
- why is it that creationists (May 6 2007 - 11:20am)
- totally agree.
i never (May 9 2007 - 6:06pm)
- i have read stories of (May 9 2007 - 8:01pm)
- people in their oblivious (May 9 2007 - 9:41pm)
- Modern thought has perverted (May 9 2007 - 11:57pm)
- "Disagreeing with you and (May 10 2007 - 12:06am)
- In the beginning the Word (May 10 2007 - 12:13am)
- quoting the fairy tale (May 10 2007 - 12:31am)
- This is why I speak to them (May 10 2007 - 1:08am)
- wow! i had no idea that my (May 12 2007 - 9:00am)
- Just want to clarify. When I (May 24 2007 - 5:21am)
- thank you. :) you made my (May 24 2007 - 5:52pm)
- Hey Maggie I just wanna say (May 24 2007 - 3:41am)
- Just want to clarify. When I (May 24 2007 - 5:21am)
- wow! i had no idea that my (May 12 2007 - 9:00am)
- This is why I speak to them (May 10 2007 - 1:08am)
- quoting the fairy tale (May 10 2007 - 12:31am)
- In the beginning the Word (May 10 2007 - 12:13am)
- "Disagreeing with you and (May 10 2007 - 12:06am)
- Modern thought has perverted (May 9 2007 - 11:57pm)
- people in their oblivious (May 9 2007 - 9:41pm)
- i have read stories of (May 9 2007 - 8:01pm)
- totally agree.
i never (May 9 2007 - 6:06pm)
- Part of the Bible MAY be (May 6 2007 - 4:56pm)
- What's worse is that they (Jun 3 2007 - 10:44pm)
- Re: T Rex ate coconuts and then (Apr 22 2009 - 8:54pm)
- Re: T Rex ate coconuts and then (Jan 13 2009 - 8:47pm)
- Re: Re: T Rex ate coconuts and then (Feb 13 2009 - 8:54am)
- I can tell by your (Feb 13 2009 - 6:23pm)
- Re: I can tell by your (Mar 10 2009 - 1:42pm)
- ... and I don't even have a (Mar 10 2009 - 1:55pm)
- Re: I can tell by your (Mar 10 2009 - 1:42pm)
- I can tell by your (Feb 13 2009 - 6:23pm)
- Ahh yes, "the truth". That (Jan 13 2009 - 9:11pm)
- Re: Re: T Rex ate coconuts and then (Feb 13 2009 - 8:54am)
- as a retired high school (May 7 2007 - 2:51am)
- God created men,womyn, and (May 6 2007 - 12:33pm)
Know Science And Want To Write?
What People Are Saying
- "Mr. Dennehey, Mr. Lozier and colleagues reason thusly. Everyone knows that stories of Bigfoot are..."
- "People can reduce blood triglyceride levels with the same measures that reduce cholesterol levels..."
- "Do you have a reference that the Romans used this method? Not challenging your statement. Need..."
- "I am a thermal dynamics engineer. There is NOTHING in the world that you have to SHAKE to make..."
- "And so the professor further reinforces what is already blatantly obvious. This article is another..."
- Rare sheep could be key to better diagnostic tests in developing world, says Stanford study
- Imaging sound: acoustics that help blind people 'see' the world
- Coolest spacecraft ever will measure Cosmic Microwave Background
- Fas-apoptosis inhibitory molecule may provide key to treating liver and neurodegenerative diseases
- Entacapone and Tolcapone: Parkinson's disease drugs may fight drug-resistant TB
Who's
Online?
Online?
339 guests
The law of causality is a law of nature. The law of causality shows that it is impossible to explain the absolute origin of the universe naturally: We can say what caused a supernova, but what caused the thing that caused the supernova? That is a question that we can scientifically answer through laws of nature for a long time into the distant past. However, there cannot be infinite regress. There must be an original uncaused cause. This uncaused cause is by definition outside of nature and its laws--supernatural.