Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Patrick Lockerby | March 16th 2009 02:54 AM | 19 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More The Chatter Box articles

All

About Patrick Lockerby

Retired engineer, 60+ years young.
Computer builder and programmer.
Linguist specialising in language acquisition and computational linguistics.
Interested in every human endeavour except the... Full Bio

The climate change skeptic asks - 'Given that the climate changes over millenia due to powerful natural forces, how could humans possibly contribute any significant effect to climate change, given our brief existence in geological time?'

I shall try to answer that question with examples from engineering which show how short-term pulse events can significantly affect long-term cyclic events.

The Influence of Short-Term Events on Long-Term Events.

Many observed events can best be understood in terms of  cycles. The most obvious and visible cyclic events are the day/night cycle, the moon phase cycle and the season cycle. Cycles can be described mathematically in terms of time and space as amplitudes and durations. The radius of a planetary orbit is an amplitude, and its year is a duration. Real planetary orbits are nowhere near so simple, but remain cyclic nevertheless.


Tides, simply put, are a matter of amplitude (sea level variation) and duration (wavelength). Wavelength and amplitude are not sufficient to describe wave motions. As soon as we see two or more factors contributing to a wave pattern we must consider phase. Phase, simply put, is a measure of the degree to which any two waves are synchronised. We must also consider integration, the way in which waves contribute positively and negatively to a complex pattern.

There are some clear demonstration of wave patterns and interactions here, courtesy of Dr. Dan Russell, Kettering University.

This diagram shows a complex wave.


Here is another complex wave.



The first graph, from Illinois State Museum, is a plot of ice volume over thousands of years.  The second is a plot of speech sound over a few thousandths of a second.  Both graphs look chaotic.  Neither one is.  The speech graph is actually a plot of part of the English 'ou' sound in 'out'.


Stability and Instability in Wave Patterns.

An analogue television takes as input a complex wave, and shows a picture by plotting the waveform as scan lines of brightness and colour across a screen. The image has to be synchronised to the transmitted signal - we must know where in the waveform the start of each frame of the picture lies. Short pulses are injected into the transmitted signal to mark the start of each line, and each frame as a set of lines. Notoriously, older TVs were prone to interference from passing vehicles or aircraft. This would cause the picture to scroll vertically or to waver horizontally. Digital TVs are prone to a different kind of visual interference due to similar desynchronisation. A low energy brief pulse can destabilise a higher energy wave.

A wave pattern can be made stable by the injection of a brief wave or pulse at the appropriate frequency. This fact underlies much of the consumer electronics industry and is the subject of many patents. Conversly, a wave pattern can be made unstable by the injection of a desynchronising pulse. A passing vehicle with inadequate interference suppression, a drifting oscillator in a TV or monitor - examples are numerous. A regular wave pattern can be of exceedingly long duration, and a desynchronising pulse exceedingly brief. Nevertheless, the same dynamic principles apply. I must emphasise this simple fact: a low energy brief pulse can destabilise a longer duration and higher energy cyclic phenomenon.


Damping and Excitation.

If a periodic physical system has a force applied to it in such a way as to reduce the amplitude, it is said to be damped. Conversely, if the force tends to increase the amplitude, the system is said to be excited.

Excess damping can halt a cyclic system. Excess excitation can force a system into an overload or catastrophic failure mode. The common piston engine is a 'cyclic-event' machine. Water in tiny amounts can be injected into an internal combustion engine to improve its efficiency. This was done with the Merlin engine used in the WW2 Spitfire. Over-injection of water will cause over-cooling, leading to a drop in power and eventual stopping of the engine. Similar injection of nitrous oxide into a piston engine will also increase the power. Taken to excess, the engine will either overheat or over-rev, in either case the engine is severely damaged or destroyed.


Examples of Catastrophic Failure.

The Tacoma Narrows bridge and the Tay bridge collapses are widely known. Less widely known is the collapse of three cooling towers at Ferrybridge in the UK in 1965. These failures are briefly described in this report. I recall an official accident report citing venturi effects, but cannot find a link at this time. The venturi effect causes a lowering of pressure when air passes between two objects. That effect was overlooked when the towers were designed. Single models were used in a wind tunnel, not pairs or groups.

London's Millenium Bridge affords another good example of the pulse effect. Although the Romans, and probably the Greeks, knew about the need for soldiers to break step when crossing a bridge, it appears that the Millenium Bridge's designers never studied the history of engineering design.


Energy cycles and Climate Change.

Geological climate changes took place over vast amounts of time.
The span of the human race is but an eyeblink in comparison.

How very true! However. Over geological timescales the forces of nature laid down formations from which we extract coal, gas and oil. We are talking here about timescales measured in millions of years, with a relatively small deposit made in nature's energy banks every year. Taking CO2 out of the atmosphere through the use of solar energy had two effects. Firstly, the blanketing effect of CO2 as a greenhouse gas was kept within limits. Secondly, the effective extraction of the heat energy in sunlight and its storage in the energy banks undergound helped keep the planetary average temperature within limits.

The creation of organic molecules through photosynthesis absorbs energy. The conversion of biological remains into fossil fuels absorbs energy. Compare the energy rate and time period of geological deposition of fossil fuels as both carbon and heat energy with our current rates of heat energy and CO2 release.

Our exhaustion of fuel reserves implies the release as a geological scale short-term pulse of the carbon and the heat energy which was stored as part of a geological era.


Concluding Remarks.

In order to compare like with like, the total cooling effect of creating the fossil fuel stocks over millenia must be compared to the total warming effects of consuming them over decades. This effect of humans on the geological-scale rhythms of our planet needs to be investigated, rather than denied.

The thermal equilibrium system of our planet itself comprises multiple subsystems and factors. The single current most important, and most commonly overlooked perturbation factor is the heat released when fossil fuels are burned. The burning of fossil fuels at a geometrically increasing rate over a geologically brief period is, given our current knowledge of the physics, indisputably a significant factor in climate change. Not so much due to CO2 emissions, but due to the energy stored over millenia being released over decades. Only a fraction of this daily anthropogenic heat input is radiated into space.

Reference:
Thermal Pollution causes global warming
Bo Nordell Division of Water Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden - Dec 2001

Comments

Stellare's picture
Interesting perspective!

logicman's picture
Interesting perspective!


Thanks!  But is it in any way a valid  perspective?

Stellare's picture
The climate models are just mathematics that we feed with what we believe is real geophysical data. As such your perspective can be valid, but I don't know the details of the models that well to go on beyond general and principle views.

However, I found this article on what scientists believe concerning a tipping point. :-)

http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE52F7EQ20090317?sp=...

logicman's picture
It really doesn't matter what scientists believe.  At least, not in any competition against legal truth.  A legal truth cannot be argued against in any court of lower or equivalent jurisdiction.
In Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education, (Administrative Court), Mr. Justice Burton determined the legal truth of the following statement:

"The IPCC predicts that it would take millennia for rises of that magnitude to occur."

So, there we have it. The ice in Greenland and Antarctica will most definitely not melt, and sea levels will most definitely not rise catastrophically at the decade scale - because Mr. Justice Burton says so.

Fortunately for human survival, UK government climatologists seem not to feel themselves bound by this ruling.

Stellare's picture
Prediction is a tough business. You almost certainly will be wrong but you can always hope that your guesses won't be too far from what eventually appears as facts. Climate modeling is no different in this respect. We are, not surprisingly, better at predicting the near future than the more distant future.

Predicting the next move of a complex system like our planet is no easy task. Any court ruling on the matter seems plain ridiculous. Actually, I'm surprised they have not ruled that God exist! The ultimate proof and final word in the philosophical discussions on the matter. Haha

Well, the rest of us will strive to understand how the planet works - and notoriously feed the society with advise based on our current knowledge. :-)

rholley's picture
Actually, I'm surprised they have not ruled that God exist!

I think they'd be a bit scared to.  Here (Psalm 82) is what God thinks about human courts.
 1 God presides in the great assembly;
       he gives judgment among the "gods":

 2 "How long will you(all) defend the unjust
       and show partiality to the wicked?

 3 Defend the cause of the weak and fatherless;
       maintain the rights of the poor and oppressed.

 4 Rescue the weak and needy;
       deliver them from the hand of the wicked.

 5 "They know nothing, they understand nothing.
       They walk about in darkness;
       all the foundations of the earth are shaken.

 6 "I said, 'You are "gods";
       you are all sons of the Most High.'

 7 But you will die like mere men;
       you will fall like every other ruler."

 8 Rise up, O God, judge the earth,
       for all the nations are your inheritance.

Stellare's picture
Man, that freaks me out. :-)

logicman's picture
All courts of law should be required to follow the precepts of Micah 6:8 - they should 'do justice' and 'love mercy'.

I know it's not science, but it is a valid part of philosophical  discussion: ethics.

Stellare's picture
I have nothing against justice and I always welcome mercy. :-) It is religious intimidation that freaks me out.

Gerhard Adam's picture
Religion, by definition, requires intimidation.  How else can one postulate a divine being whose sole purpose is in judging the behavior of his "creation" to dole out punishments and rewards?

Stellare's picture
I know. Religion is all about power and scaring the living hell out of the feeble human. :-) That is why I am so happy there are numerous choices - you can pick your best horror. Personally I'm not even a fan of horror movies. I try to stay away from all things horror.  :-)

For survival:
Mercy, mercy, mercy - I'm only a woman. What do I know. Pray for me.

logicman's picture
How else can one postulate a divine being whose sole purpose is in
judging the behavior of his "creation" to dole out punishments and
rewards?

Maybe life isn't a dream, or a computer program.

Maybe the cosmos is just one big Skinner box.

Stellare's picture
Oh, what the heck! Let's throw Pavlov in the equations as well. :-D

logicman's picture
Pavlova? It's enough to make anyone salivate!

Enough already!

You've all got me hijacking my own blog!

Gerhard Adam's picture
Why does the question "...how could humans possibly contribute any significant effect to climate change,..."? sound suspiciously like "how could this twinkie possibly make me fat"?

Regardless of the innocuous appearance of the accused twinkie, be assured it is a vicious purveyor of fat in the human body.

Hank's picture
No snowflake in an avalance takes the blame.

logicman's picture
be assured it is a vicious purveyor of fat

Careful, now!

Scientific observations like that get picked up fairly early by SLAPP lawyers.

logicman's picture
No snowflake in an avalance takes the blame.

Voltaire?

there are traces everywhere of what we failed to see.

Karl Marx, to Engels, on climate change in historical times, 1868.

Larry Arnold's picture
I recall the Ferrybridge cooling towers but then I would asthey used to be a landmark on the coach journey to Scarborough. I certainly recall the incident in question, as I do the Ronan point incident.

In my time however I have seen many more fall to the demolition engineer, including 13 at Hams Hall C which featured in Pevsners Buildings of England no less. Of lesser height than Ferrybridge but no less significant in their local landscape.

As for wobbly bridges, they are all too common, my high school had one, and there is another over Coventry's infamous ring road.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.