Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Patrick Lockerby | March 16th 2009 08:22 AM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More The Chatter Box articles

All

About Patrick Lockerby

Retired engineer, 60+ years young.
Computer builder and programmer.
Linguist specialising in language acquisition and computational linguistics.
Interested in every human endeavour except the... Full Bio

This blog is not about music, unless it be the 'music of the spheres'.


It is a sad fact that, throughout recorded history, many books have been irretrievably lost. In many cases, had these books survived, they may have given some insight into the life and character of their authors. Such is the case with all but one of the books of the geometer Hipparchus.

If people think of ancient geometers at all, they usually think of Euclid or Pythagorus. If they think of ancient astronomers at all, they usually think of Plato or Ptolemy. Poor Hipparchus! What did he ever do to deserve such obscurity?


Hipparchus built a foundation in astronomy and geometry on which Ptolemy (Claudius Ptolemaeus), some three centuries later, would build an intellectual edifice to last a thousand years. It is entirely plausible that Hipparchus drew from Babylonian sources in building his geometry. This does not in any way detract from his genius. Hipparchus' table of chords was incredibly accurate for its day, and formed the basis of the table of chords in Ptolemy's Almagest.


I wonder what Hipparchus might have made of Bertrand's paradox. Perhaps he would have resolved the paradox by making a random choice from a discrete set of pre-calculated chords, somewhat akin to Bertrand's random radius method.


Caveat: I am not a mathematician. I study the ancients from a linguistics / philosophy perspective. If I understand any of the math without the intervention of a severe headache, I count myself extremely fortunate.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.