Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Lee Silver | March 14th 2007 11:15 AM | 14 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Challenging Nature articles

All

About Lee Silver

Professor of molecular biology and public policy at Princeton University , Silver has a Ph.D. in biophysics from Harvard and B.A. and M.S. degrees... Full Bio

Homeopathic medicine was the creation of a single person, Samuel Hahnemann, who graduated from a German medical school in 1779 and practiced the "healing arts" until 1843, first in Germany and then in Paris.  The theoretical underpinning of Hahnemann's new approach to health and vitality is that a healthy human being is inhabited by an integrated spirit or vital force. 

In Hahnemann's words, "The vital force that animates the healthy body, rules with unbounded sway, and  retains all the parts of the organism in admirable, harmonious, vital operation . . . so that our indwelling, reason-gifted mind can freely employ this living, healthy instrument for the higher purpose of our existence." Diseases and ailments (other than those inflicted by physical blows to the body) are supposedly not caused by material substances.  Rather, as Hahnemann wrote, "when a person falls ill, it is only this spiritual vital force, everywhere present in his organism, that is primarily deranged by another dynamic influence hostile to his life."  So how does a patient overcome disease? By consuming a positive spiritual medicine that "occupies precisely the seat hitherto occupied by the derangement." 

In other words, the demonic element of the vital spirit must be replaced by the angelic element of the natural homeopathic remedy. 

Early in his career, Hahnemann was rightly disturbed by many European medical practices -- including bloodletting with leeches, poison-induced vomiting, and acid-induced skin blisters -- that made patients sicker than they were before treatment.  In 1790, he came across a manuscript (while plying his second trade as a translator of Latin into German) from a Peru-based missionary describing the remarkable malaria-curing ability of powder from the bark of Cinchona (a species of South American evergreen tree).  Others had attributed the cure simply to the caustic taste of the bark, but Hahnemann realized that more caustic substances did not elicit similar cures, and so this simple explanation was false.  Curiosity drove him to do what other physician-scientists of his day did  -- self-experimentation on the consequences of ingesting Cinchona powder. After several days, Hahnemann had the epiphany of his life when he became ill with fever-like symptoms similar to those caused by malaria.

Through the similarity in symptoms evoked by a single disease and its curative agent -- which are not nearly as similar as he imagined -- Hahnemann came to the conclusion that cures to every kind of human disease could be obtained from substances that elicited the same set of symptoms in otherwise healthy people.  This assertion, which he called the "Law of Similars," with the adage "likes are cured by likes," became the empirical basis for practicing his newly invented homeopathic (literally similar-suffering) system of medicine. Homeopathy was presented in contrast to what Hahnemann referred to as allopathic treatment with medicines that produced effects opposite to the disease they were meant to cure. 

Over the next 20 years, Hahnemann traveled far and wide with his students and family members to evaluate the effects of ingesting plant and animal-derived substances from as many sources as he could find.  When a substance produced sensations similar to the symptoms of any known disease, it was added to his list of homeopathic medicines. However, as a good physician, Hahnemann didn't want to make people sicker than they were already, so he diluted a drop of the symptom-causing substance over and over again into alcohol or water with vigorous shaking and rubbing at each stage. (For insoluble substances, dilutions were made into powdered sugar.) 

Through this process, he claimed, medicines became more potent or "highly dynamized."  In 1810, Hahnemann published the first edition of his masterpiece, Organon der Heilkunst (Organon of Medicine), which elaborated the philosophy of homeopathy and the arguments for its validity in 271 aphorisms (the number changed in each subsequent edition). The sixth and last edition, written in 1842 but not published until 1921, is still the basic text and defining source for homeopathic practitioners worldwide today.

Since disease is spiritual, not material, a cure is best effected when the medicine contains no interference -- no material substance -- from the original curative agent. The greater the dilution, the stronger the medicinal spirit becomes. A dilution of 10100 (equal to the digit one followed by 100 zeros) is spiritually potent, but a dilution of 10400 (a number equal to all the particles in at least  10200 universes as big as our own) is even more potent.  Hahnemann was adamant that material medicines couldn't cure disease, but he accepted mesmerizers as a valid homeopathic alternative. 

Mesmerizers were "strong-willed, well-intentioned" people with an overabundance of vital force, some of which could be donated to a sick person whose own vital force was deficient.  However, to maintain their abilities, mesmerizers had to avoid sexual intercourse and masturbation so that "all the fine vital spirits that would otherwise  be employed in the production of the semen, are ready to be communicated to others."

Why was Hahnemann so confident in his understanding of health and disease? First, he argued, no visible agent can be seen in association with malaria, syphilis, or smallpox, so their causes must be spiritual. (Within a century, Pasteur's germ theory of infection would invalidate this claim.)  Second, when a bar of iron is rubbed repeatedly in the same direction with a metal file, it can gain more and more "magnetic power," without any change in its mass.  "In the same way," Hahnemann wrote, "shaking a medicinal substance develops the medicinal powers hidden within . . ." (Within a century, physicists would explain magnet formation in terms of aligning atomic axes inside a metal.) Third, no material substance had been identified that was responsible for the malaria-curing properties in Cinchona bark. (In 1820, during his lifetime, quinine was discovered as the active chemical inside the bark. He never acknowledged this finding.) 

Hahnemann had no use for scientific method or theory. He belittled scientifically-oriented physicians in writing, "How the vital force causes the organism to . . . produce disease, it would be of no practical utility to the  physician to know, and will forever remain concealed from him. . ."  His faith in the truth of his "law" likes are cured by likes was so great and absolute, he saw no need to test the effectiveness of homeopathic remedies on actual sick people. Homeopathic remedies are still subjected to "provings," (their term) only by determining whether they cause disease-like sensations in a healthy person when used at full strength, not by determining whether they actually have any curative effects in diluted form on an unhealthy person.  Meanwhile, so-called allopathic medicines that produce effects opposite to the disease -- like aspirin's relief of pain -- are rejected because they are not in harmony with the body's vital spirit.

Homeopathy is particularly appealing to Church-rejecting post-Christian Westerners who embrace a spiritual sense of nature that is under attack from capitalistic agriculture and paternalistic medicine.  The post-Christian worldview is particularly widespread in France and Germany where pharmacies typically give homeopathic remedies as much shelf space as real medicines.    

 

In the U.S., people with more education and less religion are also more likely to succumb to pseudo-scientific naturalistic claims made by producers of organic food, dietary supplements, vitamins, and (less frequently) homeopathic remedies, all of which are marketed as natural alternatives in what they view to be an increasingly unnatural, spiritless world. 


Comments

Hank's picture
Impressions:

- Religous people believe in science more than faith on this topic than non-religious people

- People are less likely to be skeptical of facts they want to believe

Yah all this may be true about people taking vitamins and eating organic food for pseudo-scientific reasons, but their are also valid scientific reasons for taking your vitamins and eating organic food (at least in general).  The chemicals sprayed on crops, at least some of them are estrogen mimicking when ingested in the body, and can cause some bad things to happen, I forget exactly what.  I just remembered that it was bad.  Also, the national instutitue of health, or some big organization like that, used to say it was unessecary to take vitamins back in the 30s and 40s, now the say the exact opposite. 

Cash's picture
can cause some bad things to happen, I forget exactly what.

and

national instutitue of health, or some big organization like that

heh ... please tell us you are kidding!!

Kidding about what? I just forgot the specifics, because its been a while, and I didn't feel like looking them up again. I am not sure what exactly you are getting at....Please be mroe specific.  Or if you know something that I don't, then please tell me!  After all, this is health we are talking about here.  

docartemis's picture

This week's episode of the Nature Podcast has a good discussion of the issue of whether homeopathy should be taught as a science. Apparently this is being done in the UK. I hope this trend doesn't spread, since it would contribute to students misunderstanding what makes science science.

Homeopathy may work as a placebo, but none of the controlled clinical trials have shown any effect about that predicted for a placebo. 

Dr. Ginger Campbell
http://virginiacampbellmd.com

 


Good Article

Many of us still opt for Homeopathic medicines when it comes to getting rid of any kind of ailment from the root.So i think that homeopathy should be taught as it can serve to be the best natural way to get rid of many ailments without leaving any side-effects on the person.


The very foundation of homoeopathic practice considers man not only as an individual, but as a complete unit in himself, of which all his parts comprise a well-balanced whole. Homoeopathy, therefore, does not consider any one part as being ill, but considers the manifestation of illness in one part in its relation to the whole man.

Hello!! I must say you have done a great research on this. Awesome post and i just loved reading this. You might be thinking that i m running casino site and still i love this kind of article becoz i love reading good articles and facts.

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Miriam




Homeopathy has such good features...its just that people are not much aware of those facts.Great post....keep up the work!

If a therapeutic drug doesnt cause any adverse side effects in an otherwise normal healthy or in a person not rightly diagnosed, than it can not produce the beneficial therapeutic effects. The problem with homeopathy is that it proclaims exceptional security that is beyond the scientific parameters, because in any science, possibility of some errors do exist. Indeed, my interest to know the use of metals in Homeopathy without causing any side effects lead to many Homoepaths, but not even a single soul was ready for proper scientific trials. Instead they tried all kind of vague arguements against the proper in vivo/ in vitro trials on the ground of their diagnostic approach, whereas in their normal practice they apply the similar terminolgy and diagnosis of modern(allopathic) medicine. In my medical career of 20 odd years, practicing and professing modern medicine, I havent came across a single patient cured or controlled of the sign and symptoms of a patient treated by Homeopathy. On the contrary, I have seen the patients suffering with adverse side effects of Homeopathic treatments, especially where metals are used like Arsenic producing warts on skin and on groin as an example. There are other patients suffering with iatrogenic effects, sometimes very difficult to detect the culprit drug. I wonder, why Homeopathy, if at all workable, can not be tested and tried on the same principles and protocols, as any drug develoved by modern medicine scientist has to undergo before being allowed to be used by Drug controlling authorities all over the world. And why the highly vigilant authorities like USFDA has lenient view on Homeopathy and its propenators.

Great Post. Does anyone know if there is a legal way I can display this content on my own website- thanks


This debate need deliberations and discussions. As I have written earlier, Homeopathy causes more harm than any theraeupatic benefit by delaying the patient to reach the right medical specialist, therby aggravating the disease syndrome. This happens because homeopaths advertise themselves blatantly and beyond the purview of any law. Whereas physicians practicising modern medicine are governed by law, responsible in courts of justice, and can not advertise in any medium. Even their finding of adverse imact of allied medical therapies are seived through various legal proceedures protecting the dubious practioners of various system of therapeutics. Riduculous are the ways of governance. People forget that the ultimate losser, financially and physically, is the patient.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.