Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

's Recommended Blogs
[x]
hasn't added any blog recommendations yet.
1
Blogs Instructions
's Recommended Books
[x]
hasn't added any book recommendations yet.
1
Books Instructions
's Affiliates and Organizations
[x]
hasn't added any organizations or groups yet.
1
Badges Instructions
Add Nadia Ramlagan to your friends
[x]
User picture for
Add
Cancel
Fake Banner
Search This Blog
About Nadia

Nadia lives near Washington, DC.

...

View Nadia 's Profile
By Nadia Ramlagan | May 12th 2008 08:43 PM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
Perhaps no physicist has come closer to becoming the ultimate politician as Albert Einstein, when he was asked to become the second president of Israel in 1952. He declined of course, but decades later more and more scientists are plunging into the political scene.

There have always been “celebrity scientists”, evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould and physicist Richard Feynman to name a few. But celebrity status doesn’t lead to the power to pass legislation.

A suspicious public, misleading media coverage, and lack of public debate has caused a growing number of scientists to advocate for "evidence-based decision making" in public policy, rather than the influence of popular emotion or intuitive appeal.