Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Fake Banner
By Sina Kashefipour | September 4th 2009 07:52 AM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
This story caught my eye. 

"China currently accounts for 93 percent of production of so-called rare earth elements — and more than 99 percent of the output for two of these elements, dysprosium and terbium, vital for a wide range of green energy technologies and military applications like missiles."

"In each of the last three years, China has reduced the amount of rare earths that can be exported. This year’s export quotas are on track to be the smallest yet. But what is really starting to alarm Western governments and multinationals alike is the possibility that exports
will be further restricted. "

As the author mentions the idea behind China's policy with important rare minerals is like the Middle East and oil.  This strikes me as interesting for a few reasons: a) strategically this allows China charge a premium upon companies that want to use the minerals, b) consequently this allows Chian more control over the development of technologies that use the minerals, and c) economically because of China's relative strength in this market can essentially charge "rents" that prices that are not subject to market valuation further raising prices.

This is interesting. China's control over rare minerals parallels the early United States' access to wide resources.  There is not only the possibility of relative self sufficiency but also the ability to bolster one's economy by charging a premium on others. 

Comments

Maktub's picture
You're right in your concern about the rise of 'the private PRC'.  This 'new cold war' mental projection of China is a social construct designed to distract inferior classes, while the hegemonic elite strengthen their economic interdependence.  To me, this is another significant piece of evidence for world government.

Instead of interdependence it could just be dependence considering the large potential of China to control the market.

Maktub's picture
Dependence is a much better word - right.

Its like oil only with material that 100 times rarer.  Probably more expensive too.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.