Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Michael White | October 29th 2008 09:13 PM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Adaptive Complexity articles

All

About Michael White

Welcome to Adaptive Complexity, where I write about genomics, systems biology, evolution, and the connection between science and literature, government, and society.

I'm a biochemist


... Full Bio

At long last I'm getting a paper out the door, which means my latest blog column's been delayed.

In the mean time, John Hawks (whose blog you should be reading) has some priceless stuff on Richard Dawkins' war on Harry Potter:

Well, since he's outlining what would be the topic of a fifteen-year longitudinal study on cognition and reading experiences, I would guess that he'll settle for just waving his arms around and saying "wizards-bad-BAD." Which is pretty much what he did in The God Delusion.

I like Dawkins, but that's only because I've been very selective in my Dawkins reading. The Ancestor's Tale was amazing. I purposely haven't touched The God Delusion. (Daniel Dennett probably did a much better job in Breaking The Spell ).

Comments

Hank's picture
Well, since he's outlining what would be the topic of a fifteen-year longitudinal study on cognition and reading experiences, I would guess that he'll settle for just waving his arms around and saying "wizards-bad-BAD." Which is pretty much what he did in The God Delusion.

Perfect. And as if that wasn't money quote enough ...
I'm wondering whether we should be scaring children with Dawkins...

I went to blogroll him and noticed that URL he has is some sort of Byzantine maze ... or a dare: http://johnhawks.net/weblog/hawks/hawks.html

adaptivecomplexity's picture
Yeah, Hawks has a pretty extensive setup. He says he tries to use his website to help his research productivity, which means he is much more organized than I am.

Steve Davis's picture
Michael, if you like Dawkins, check out his treatment of Freeman Dyson a few months back. You might change your mind.

adaptivecomplexity's picture
I haven't heard anything about his treatment of Dyson. I'll have to go check it out.

As I said, I do like Dawkins's science stuff very much. And in books like A Devil's Chaplin he makes some very passionate and excellent arguments for wider application of the scientific method.

But going off on Harry Potter? I'm baffled. Also, I'm not a religious believer myself, and I hate the influence of conservative religion on US politics, but I find some of Dawkins' attacks on all religion over the top.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.