Banner
By Michael White | September 25th 2009 11:52 AM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
About Michael

Welcome to Adaptive Complexity, where I write about genomics, systems biology, evolution, and the connection between science and literature,

...

View Michael's Profile
The NIH has made public how often they fund grants below the payline. 18% of R01s scored below the nominal cutoff get funded anyway. A good chunk of those are grants from new investigators.

This is a good thing - not because lower quality grants are getting funded; they're not - these just-below-cutoff grants are likely to be just as good. New investigators frequently get screwed by study sections. With smaller labs, a shorter track record, and less experience working the system, new investigators are at an intrinsic disadvantage in the current grant review system. Given two research proposals of equal quality from a new and a senior investigator, the senior investigator is more likely to get funded. As everyone who's gone through the process, as an applicant or a reviewer, knows, study sections can on occasion trash a grant proposal for dumb reasons, and the NIH program officers should have some latitude.

Read the feed:


Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.