Track your comments!
[x]


When you register, comments on your articles and replies to your comments appear here. Register Now!

Sign in to your account
[x]

Not a Scientific Blogging member yet?

Register Now for a Free Scientificblogging.com Account

  • Customize your profile with pictures, banner, a blogroll and more.
  • Leave comments on articles, add other members to your friend lists, chat with people on the site.
  • Write blog posts that can be seen by hundreds of thousands of readers.

It's free and it only takes a minute!

Already a Scientific Blogging member?

Sign In Now

Banner
By Michael White | January 27th 2009 10:19 AM | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
.

More Adaptive Complexity articles

All

About Michael White

Welcome to Adaptive Complexity, where I write about genomics, systems biology, evolution, and the connection between science and literature, government, and society.

I'm a biochemist


... Full Bio

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is getting a new president as well: Nobel laureate Peter Agre. He tells the New York Times that scientists need to get involved as citizens is they are concerned about good science policy:

Q. RESEARCH AMERICA, THE WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP, HAS BEEN TRYING TO GET SCIENTISTS TO RUN FOR OFFICE. IS THAT REALISTIC?

A. Oh, it’s doable. But the Senate is a very lofty place to start at, unless you’re prominent or extremely wealthy. There are other places for scientists to serve: school boards, town councils, state legislatures, even Congress. Bill Foster, a physicist at Fermilab, ran for Congress when Dennis Hastert gave up his seat. Leon Lederman (a Nobel Prize-winning physicist) organized a bunch of us to get out for Bill, and he won.

During the Bush administration, you heard a lot of complaining about science policy. Staying in our laboratories wasn’t going to change that. One of the things I wanted to do from the Senate [Agre considered running for the Minnesota seat won by Al Franken] is put a human face on science. I can also do that this year as president of the A.A.A.S.

This is a point well taken, but I personally have never seen hard data on how the civic participation of scientists compares with that of other career groups. I know many scientists who are very active citizens when it comes to things like attending town&school board meetings and volunteering for political campaigns, but I don't personally know any with elected positions on school boards of town councils. Does my anecdotal experience reflect real trends or not? I have no idea.

Perhaps another issue is that scientists migrate frequently. After college, grad school, and a postdoc, you generally don't end up settling long-term in a community until your mid-30's. Once you settle, you're working hard so that you don't have to move again in another 6-7 years after a tenure denial. Successful scientists often leave anyway after a decade, as they get recruited to a more prestigious university somewhere else.

What this means is that running for elected office is something people in this career track don't consider seriously until much later in life, and by that time, it is probably much harder to establish habits of civic participation. But that's no excuse. If you want science to influence public policy in your community, then run for office.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite> <code> <TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.